RNA-mediated events are not a matter of faith

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: October 3, 2014

A Matter of Faith—movie review

Highlighting real world problems for Christian families

By Gary Bates Published: 25 September 2014 (GMT+10)

Excerpt: “Parents need to be aware that they must deal with this issue of origins in the home because public education is not neutral when it comes to origins. The fact is university campuses today are really churches of atheism because they teach a materialistic view of our origins.”
My comment: Until recently, I thought ‘churches of atheism’ was too harsh a criticism of most academic institutions. However, the refutations of gene-centric neo-Darwinian theories of evolution that typically accompany materialistic views of our origins have continued to rapidly arrive. These refutations overwhelm me with new experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect. At the same time, theorists continue to tout their pseudoscientific nonsense about mutations, natural selection, or whatever else they think leads to the evolution of biodiversity.
Serious scientists publish articles like this:

Single-molecule correlated chemical probing of RNA.

Excerpt: “Single-molecule MaP experiments that explore protein–RNA, RNA–RNA, and DNA-mediated interactions simultaneously are clearly feasible. Higher-order structure is tightly linked to biological function.”
My comment: The complexity of the links from molecular structure to biological function in the context of RNA-directed DNA methylation and RNA-mediated events linked to DNA-mediated interactions exemplify how the epigenetic landscape becomes the physical landscape of DNA in the organized genomes of species from microbes to man. Simply put, conserved molecular mechanisms link ecological variation to nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled ecological adaptations.
When articles clearly detail links between molecular structure and biological function, evolutionary theorists simply continue to ignore what they cannot understand. They cannot understand why mutations never lead to the increasing organismal complexity that is manifested in the morphological and behavioral diversity of species from microbes to man.
Here’s what they cannot understand:

Molecular structure must be linked to biological function!

Theorists will tell you that morphological and behavioral phenotypes have evolved, but they refuse to say anything about how molecular structure and biological function are linked from one species to another.
Ecological variation links molecular structure to biological function via epigenetic effects of olfactory/pheromonal input on RNA-mediated events and morphological and behavioral phenotypes, which are manifestation of ecological adaptations in species from microbes to man. The morphological and behavioral phenotypes are not manifestations of mutations, natural selection, or anything else that theorists claim is linked to the evolution of biodiversity.
Mutations perturb the formation of molecular structures that are directly linked to biological functions, which is why mutations are linked to diseases and disorders. They cannot be linked to increasing organismal complexity via theories that link mutations to pathology and human suffering. Evolutionary theorists contribute to human suffering by ignoring what is known about molecular structure and biological function. Their ignorance is a matter of fact because of their faith in evolutionary theory.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: