Do not miss the misrepresentations

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: March 8, 2016

January 25, 2016 Reported as 1) “… they hypothesise short bursts of rapid species diversification, such as after the famous mass extinction event…”

January 11, 2016 Reported as 2) “…a newly identified protein, Wuho (WH), regulates the activity of FEN1 when around a replication fork, ensuring it does more good acting as a flap endonuclease than damage as a gap endonuclease.”

January 7, 2016 Reported as 3) “Exosomes Protect and Perpetuate Chemical Attractants”

February 12, 2016 Reported as 4) “…three sources of variation that have driven the radiation of this group. These are post-speciation hybridization, where distinct species interbreed; de novo mutation, where random mutations arise during DNA replication; and ancestral variation, where variants are carried through from the ancestral population.”

February 22, 2016 Reported as 5) “…neurons anticipate the quick, automatic eye movements know as saccades, and compensate accordingly.”

My comment: In one month, reports on 5 different research groups collectively linked energy-dependent chemotaxis and phototaxis from soil bacteria to the construction of the eye in primates via energy-dependent changes in exosomes. The exosomes link nutrient-dependent microRNA flanking sequences and hydrogen-atom transfer in DNA base pairs in solution from RNA-mediated cell type differentiation in all living genera to supercoiled DNA, which protects all organized genomes from virus-driven entropy.

The five research groups reportedly linked sources of innate variation to hybridization, random mutations, and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled variants. The variants link the morphology and behavior of yeasts to humans via the nutrient-dependent RNA-mediated immune system and amino acid substitutions in the context of the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction.

If Einstein (molecular mechanics), Schrodinger (anti-entropy), or Dobzhansky (amino acid substitutions) were not still dead, they would be rolling on the floor laughing about the ignorance displayed by neo-Darwinian evolutionists — or crying. Are you laughing, or crying? In either case, it is time to join others who are Combating Evolution to Fight Disease. If you don’t, the diseases that neo-Darwinists link to evolution will probably kill you, too.

Clearly, you and your loved ones will not evolve into a new species. No species ever has, except in theory.

[W]hat Haldane, Fisher, Sewell Wright, Hardy, Weinberg et al. did was invent…. Evolution was defined as “changes in gene frequencies in natural populations.” The accumulation of genetic mutations was touted to be enough to change one species to another…. Assumptions, made but not verified, were taught as fact.

See also: PLOS Biology ICYMI: Festive Five for honorable mention of the fact that Plants Encode a General siRNA Suppressor That Is Induced and Suppressed by Viruses

Our findings suggest that viruses have evolved to inhibit RTL1 activity, ultimately resulting in successful viral infection

My comment: [Sarcasm alert] Where on Earth do the viruses get the energy to do that? Did Einstein, Schrodinger, Dobzhansky, or anyone else ever tell us about left-over energy that could be used by viruses for their evolution?

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: