Excerpt: … far from concentrating on the development of theories of organisms and ecosystems, Neo-Darwinism concentrates on genes as the fundamental entities in biology.
…Neo-Darwinism is not only prone to misleading rhetoric and inadequate science, but its applications may result in ecologically dangerous agricultural applications.
See also: Physics: Material to meaning
Excerpt:
Carroll demonstrates the absurdity of adding to the Core Theory to explain the possibility of things such as an afterlife or a transcendent underlying purpose. These are easy targets. The narrative begins to get awkward when it comes to, say, conscious experiences. These, Carroll writes, are โnot part of the fundamental architecture of realityโ; they are emergent, a handy way of talking about what brains do. Like entropy, he argues, consciousness is a concept that โwe invent to give ourselves more useful and efficient descriptions of the worldโ. He calls his approach โpoetic naturalismโ.
See also:
Excerpt:
One exception would be a small number of pages about the multiverse, which he contrasts with religion, ending with (referring to religion)This is the problem with theories that are not well-defined.
Heโs got the problem right, but doesnโt notice that it applies equally well to this particularly dubious bit of โscienceโ.
My comment: No matter how many times that physicists are told their ‘religion’ is based on nothing but theory, they refuse to link energy as information from top-down causation to biologically-based cause and effect. Like neo-Darwinists, they fail to include energy-dependent cell type differentiation, which means they fail to link virus-driven energy theft to all pathology.That’s the magic of how the big bang cosmology industry and evolution industry are linked. Their religion requires no experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect to support their ridiculous claims. But they established the popularity of their claims and have not realized that explaining healthy longevity compared to virus-driven pathology on Earth has nothing to do with their religious beliefs or the beliefs of any others.Serious scientists have linked energy-dependent changes from angstroms to ecosystems and virus-driven energy theft to all pathology. Young earth creationist are not the only scientists who have done that.
See also: Site-selective and stereoselective functionalization of unactivated CโH bonds
Reported 5/11/16 as Chemists find ‘huge shortcut’ for organic synthesis using C-H bonds
The handedness of a molecule is important in organic chemistry, since this 3D shape affects how it interacts with other handed molecules. When developing a new drug, for instance, it is vital to control the chirality of the drug molecules because biological molecules recognize the difference.
Why would any theorist continue to think for 20 years that their ridiculous theory could stand the test of time in the context of experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect that has continued to come from serious scientists who have linked energy-dependent changes from angstroms to ecosystems in all living genera?
