Theorists sell hidden energy (2)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: January 7, 2017

(click to enlarge)

Theorists sell hidden energy (Jan 5, 2017)

January 6, 2017 Giant atoms could help unveil ‘dark matter’ and other cosmic secrets

The universe is an astonishingly secretive place. Mysterious substances known as dark matter and dark energy account for some 95% of it. Despite huge effort to find out what they are, we simply don’t know.

Our model is based on the fact that weakly interacting particles must bounce from the nucleus of the atom it collides with and exchange a small amount of energy with it – similar to the collision between two pool balls. The energy exchange will produce a sudden displacement of the nucleus that will eventually be felt by the electron. This means the entire energy of the atom changes, which can be analysed to obtain information about the properties of the colliding particle.

They do not have a model that is based on any facts. They have a theory that is based on other theories. For comparison, this is a model of biologically-based cause and effect.
Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model

…the model represented here is consistent with what is known about the epigenetic effects of ecologically important nutrients and pheromones on the adaptively evolved behavior of species from microbes to man. Minimally, this model can be compared to any other factual representations of epigenesis and epistasis for determination of the best scientific ‘fit’.

Many theorists recognize the problem with my model of adaptively evolved behavior. There is no such thing as an evolved behavior!
Ecological variation must link nutrient energy-dependent biophysically constrained RNA-mediated protein folding chemistry to supercoiled DNA or it must link virus-driven energy theft to all pathology. Serious scientists have linked energy-dependent changes from angstroms to ecosystems. They started with Schrodinger’s anti-entropic energy of sunlight and linked it to the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction.
Pseudoscientists who have ignored all the claims made by Schrodinger (1944) in “What is Life?” are making desperate attempts to convince others that they know the difference between life and death, even though they do not know the difference between healthy longevity and all pathology is virus-driven energy theft.
See: CDC forced to release documents showing they Knew Vaccine Preservative Causes Autism
Thimerosal, is metabolized (converted) into the toxic and “harmful” methylmercury. And then in turn, the harmful methylmercury is metabolized (converted) into the most harmful, long-term-toxic, “inorganic” mercury that is retained in bodily tissue.

“Inorganic” mercury is the end product of mercury metabolism. Methylmercury subject groups confirm that the metabolic pathway for mercury in the human and animal body consists in the reduction/conversion of the harmful methylmercury into a more harmful “inorganic” mercury which is tissue-bound, and long-term-toxic. Hence, both the originating substance (methylmercury) and its conversion/reduction, inorganic mercury are found.

Based on published findings by Dr. Paul King, the metabolic pathway for organic mercury involves the conversion of Ethylmercury (Thimerosal) into “methylmercury” and then the further reduction of “methylmercury” into inorganic mercury.

This is why it is important to link chirality to autophagy and RNA-mediated protein folding chemistry to supercoiled DNA. Those who cannot link metabolic networks to genetic networks via the conserved molecular mechanisms that start from the creation of hydrogen, will fail to link pH from single nucleotide polymorphisms an natural selection for energy-dependent codon optimality. They will fail to link supercoiled DNA to protection from virus-driven energy theft and genomic entropy. They will fail to protect you from disease and tell you that all pathology is caused by random mutations and evolution. They cannot find where the energy came from in Schrodinger’s equation, and they will try anything to make you think they are experts on all aspects of emergence and evolution.
See for follow-up: Thimerosal Hooker
See also: Monks in High Towers: A Plea to Our Fellow Academics

We should remember that the creation of knowledge is generally a positive sum game. When practitioners in one field make progress and gain insight, all fields stand to benefit. Our fates are intertwined. Border patrolling and tower guarding will hurt everyone. The monks in high towers should recognize that apprenticeships in other towers are not only helpful, they are essential for both the creation and conservation of understanding and knowledge.

On January 5, 2017 I published this to my blog site: “Theorists sell hidden energy” Simply put, natural selection for energy-dependent codon optimality is obviously the link to healthy longevity, and virus-driven energy theft is obviously the link to all pathology.
The facts that link energy-dependent chirality to autophagy and the transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of supercoiled DNA, which protects all organized genomes from virus-driven entropy, are no longer disputed by serious scientists. The serious scientists have linked Thomas Hunt Morgan’s claims about chromosomal inheritance from Schrodinger’s claims to Dobzhansky’s claims about RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions as the source of all energy-dependent biodiversity.
Clearly, the monks in their towers have all but died out to make room for the inevitable — a decades-old paradigm shift that started with two outsiders who were helped by a insider. The insider, Milton Diamond, was subsequently forced outside because he challenged the nature vs nurture nonsense touted by John Money.
See “From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior” (1996) and “follow the Money” from then to the claims still made now by the old monks whose towers are collapsing in their ignorance of biologically-based cause and effect.

Mr Ross’s findings may lead to the deployment of temperature-resistant strains of Wolbachia in Aedes aegypti and other mosquito species in the field.

The fact that temperature-resistant stains have only recently been considered attests to the fact that most researchers do not understand enough about physics, chemistry, and molecular epigenetics to predict that biologically-based life must consistently adapt to ecological change or species become extinct. Bacteria and other living genera do not mutate for the purpose of natural selection which reportedly linked natural selection to the evolution of all biodiversity without consideration for thermodynamic cycles of protein biosynthesis and degradation.
See: Mutation-Driven Evolution (p. 196)

(1) Mutation is the source of all genetic variation on which any form of evolution is dependent. Mutation is the change of genomic structure and includes nucleotide substitution, insertion/deletion, segmental gene duplication, genomic duplication, changes in gene regulatory systems, transposition of genes, horizontal gene transfer, etc. (2) Natural selection is for saving advantageous mutations and eliminating harmful mutations. Selective advantage of the mutation is determined by the type of DNA change, and therefore natural selection is an evolutionary process initiated by mutation. It does not have any creative power in contrast to the statements made by some authors.

See for comparison: Virus-driven mutation or amino acid substitution

Single nucleotide substitutions or indels [insertions/deletions] can lead to several hemoglobin variants owing to amino acid replacements, while molecular defects [mutations] in either regulatory or coding regions of the human HBA2, HBA1, HBB or HBD genes can minimally or drastically reduce their expression, leading to α-, β- or δ-thalassemia, respectively.