Mitochondria do not adapt

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: February 6, 2017

Mitochondria Help Cancers Grow

Mitochondria adapt by producing cycles whereby electrons are removed from carbon at a greater rate as food is oxidized to make molecules for the cancers.

Mitochondria do not ‘produce’ the ‘cycles’ that link ‘food’ from one carbon metabolism to healthy longevity. Mitochondria do not ‘adapt.’ The food enables thermodynamic cycles of nutrient energy-dependent protein biosynthesis and degradation. Jon Lieff’s “doublespeak” obscures, disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of words.
See also his section about: Altering Amino Acid Pathways
The ‘pathways’ are nutrient energy-dependent. See for instance, DEPENDENCE OF RNA SYNTHESIS IN ISOLATED THYMUS NUCLEI ON GLYCOLYSIS, OXIDATIVE CARBOHYDRATE CATABOLISM AND A TYPE OF “OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION

The synthesis of RNA in isolated thymus nuclei is ATP dependent.

Virus-driven energy theft prevents the synthesis of RNA and links the degradation of messenger RNA to all pathology via amino acid substitutions that stabilize the organized genomes of viruses. That fact makes it clear that any claims about two billion years of evolution must be placed into the context of energy-dependent exogenous RNA interference and the biophysically constrained chemistry of protein folding.
That means Jon Lieff cannot connect hisr blog post on viruses from last week to this blog post unless he ignore everything that he linked to communication among viruses.
It is time for him to admit that, like other theorists, he gives bits and pieces of information to his readers in ongoing attempts to limit the amount of accurate information they receive. He makes it difficult to integrate the information about nutrient energy-dependent healthy longevity and virus-driven energy theft.
That makes it unlikely that his readers will try to link the 2 billion-year-long absence of changes in bacteria living in ocean sediments to the weekend resurrection of the bacterial flagellum in P. fluorescens in the context of the same model.
By mixing theories with experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect, he consistently dilutes the experimental evidence and touts pseudoscientific nonsense about 2 billion years of evolution. He avoids addressing claims that the bacterial flagellum appears to have re-evolved itself sometime within 96 hours.
During that time, the nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction enabled ecological adaptation in the organisms that survived.
I’ve asked Jon Lieff, “What led you to make this false claim?”

Mitochondria adapt by producing cycles whereby electrons are removed from carbon at a greater rate as food is oxidized to make molecules for the cancers.

If he answers that question we could discuss why he linked the false claim about mitochondria that ‘adapt’ to the energy-dependent RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions that differentiate all cell types of all individuals of all living genera.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: