Bacteriophages prove evolution is a lie

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: February 8, 2017

Viruses in bacteria link the degradation of messenger RNA to the transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of Zika virus-damaged DNA and all pathology. Carl Woese was wrong  and theorists still sell hidden energy. See:Theorists sell hidden energy
See also: Opinion: Should Scientists Engage in Activism?

Their arrogance and vanity threaten to awaken the master, who will punish us all for the sins of a few.

My comment: The masters of science have always been awake, and they are now on the side of the young earth creationists. Every aspect of neo-Darwinan pseudoscientific nonsense has been refuted with experimental evidence of endogenous RNA interference in nematodes.
The March on Washington has been left to pseudoscientists who failed to link energy-dependent RNA-mediated protein folding chemistry to biophysically constrained biodiversity in all living genera via the physiology of reproduction.
The fact that pseudoscientists also failed to link virus-driven energy theft to all pathology in species from bacteria to humans leaves anyone still touting mutation-driven evolution marching in the dark.
2016 Nobel Laureates, Ben Feringa (Chemistry) and Yoshinori Ohsumi (Physiology or Medicine) linked the sun’s anti-entropic virucidal energy-dependent changes in chirality to autophagy and all pheromone-controlled biodiversity at a time when “Marchers” may claim they are not being treated fairly.

My response to a comment by Dick Gordon
My invited review of nutritional epigenetics was submitted to the journal “Nutrients” and returned without review.
Evolutionary scientists did not predict such elaborate sensory integration in a single protein system.

What model have evolutionary theorists proposed for comparison to Darwin’s “conditions of life” now that they have been linked from quantum physics and ecological variation to nutrient energy-dependent ecological adaptations in all living genera?

See also: Infographic: Dual-Purpose Photoreceptor

Description: See how different environmental conditions affect the activity of a molecule sensitive to both light and temperature.

How life survives: Researchers confirm basic mechanism of DNA repair

In addition to clarifying the roles of Mfd and UvrD, the research generally heralds the use of the new XR-seq technique in mapping and studying excision repair processes.

My comment: The speed of light on contact with water was already linked to the energy-dependent de novo creation of nucleic acids and to biophysically constrained RNA-mediated DNA repair in all living genera via the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction. The fact that ecological variation is linked to ecological adaptation in all living genera by conserved molecular mechanisms refutes all neo-Darwinian theories and all the theories of “big bang” cosmologists.

Genome-wide transcription-coupled repair in Escherichia coli is mediated by the Mfd translocase


The mfd gene was originally identified as the gene required for reducing the rate of UV mutagenesis in E. coli cells held under conditions of amino acid starvation (9, 10).

The only mention of “amino acid” is in the context of starvation and UV mutagenesis. If energy-dependent RNA-mediated DNA repair was linked from the speed of light on contact with water, all pseudoscientists would be forced to admit that young earth creationists have always known how all energy-dependent biodiversity was created and how creation was linked to the physiology of reproduction in all living genera.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: