Stuart Kauffman refutes theistic evolution

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: February 17, 2017

Biodiversity is autocatalytic (Senior author Stuart Kauffman)

…it was recently shown using the RAF algorithm that the metabolic network of Escherichia coli forms a large autocatalytic set of close to 1800 reactions (Sousa et al., 2015). As far as we know, this is the first formal proof that living organisms (or at least essential parts thereof) are indeed autocatalytic sets.

Reported as: “Autocatalytic biodiversity hypothesis aims to supplant Darwin’s ‘war of the species’

A species emerges from this environment and is an expression of those interactions. In other words, species are expressed and maintained by a complex interacting ecological network.

Few people recognize how difficult it is to link experimental evidence across disciplines. It is discouraging to to find that neo-Darwinian theorists have consistently done it with their claims about minimal mutational distances and the magic of evolution. Theorists link the natural selection of surviving organisms to biophysically constrained viral latency via nutrient energy-dependent RNA-mediated DNA repair and amino acid substitutions in supercoiled DNA.
The theistic evolutionists have made it almost impossible to refute their claims because their claims are not evidence-based. No experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect has been linked from energy-dependent biophysically constrained protein folding chemistry to all biodiversity. For example, energy-dependent changes in the microRNA/messenger RNA balance, which links natural selection for energy-dependent codon optimality has not been considered by theorists. The start without energy
A sudden drop in outdoor temperature increases the risk of respiratory infections
Sarcasm alert: If this is true, global warming may be the solution to all virus-driven pathology. If it is based on the alternative facts touted by neo-Darwinian theorists, your aging relatives are more likely to die than your children — until the advent of something like the 1918 Spanish flu, which was more deadly to younger populations.
See also: Targeting Parkinson’s-linked protein could neutralize two of the disease’s causes
You cannot target a protein without consideration for energy-dependent endogenous RNA interference (i.e., biophysically constrained RNA-mediated cell type differentiation).
It is not the proteins that cause the diseases. It is the failure of energy-dependent RNA-mediated DNA repair.
Surprise: Femtosecond blasts of UV light have been linked to natural selection for codon optimality and all biodiversity by serious scientists who have linked energy-dependent changes in angstroms to ecosystems in all living genera. Keep in mind that the serious scientists are not going to stop laughing about the claims of pseudoscientists.
See for example, this attack on the claims made by Neil deGrasse Tyson. It’s subtle, but that’s how serious scientists have fun. They know that most pseudoscientists won’t get their jokes.
Try to get used to the fact that theistic evolutionists don’t get the jokes, But first, you may need toi get over the fact that you probably were taught to believe in the pseudoscientific nonsense of neo-Darwinian theories. Admit it, you probably believed the nonsense even before it was linked to theories about Intelligent Design by alternative facts about evolution across millions of years. Some biologically uninformed theorists still seem to think led to the evolution of birds from dinosaurs.
1. See also: DNA damage is a pervasive cause of sequencing errors, directly confounding variant identification

Can you link their findings to autocatalytic biodiversity?

Can you avoid linking their findings from virus-driven energy theft to all pathology?

Can you avoid linking their findings to drug therapy-induced DNA damage that was not repaired in the context of endogenous RNA interference?

If you can avoid linking the findings from these three articles to biophysically constrained energy-dependent RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions and biodiversity in all living genera, you might be able to co-author an article on autocatalytic biodiversity and make people think it was possible for everything that emerged to automagically evolve into every species that has ever existed on Earth. But, why would you want to do that?