Allen Institute confirms food energy is information

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: March 5, 2017

See also: Theistic evolutionists fight back and lose
Excerpt: Predictably, Paul Allen will be the next to start funding works that might help to prevent the viral apocalypse, now that Bill Gates is mentally prepared to do so.

Allen Institute FB page

3/3/17 Fascinating new research on stem cell division
Scientists discover an unexpected influence [of food] on dividing stem cells’ fate

One particular protein, Pex11b, caught her attention. It is associated with the membrane that surrounds the peroxisome, an organelle that helps to free energy from food.

“While some evidence already suggested the distribution of organelles, including energy-producing mitochondria, can influence the outcome of cell division, we have shown for the first time that this phenomenon is essential to the proper behavior of and formation of the tissue,” says Fuchs, who is also a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator.

This unexpected influence of food energy on endogenous RNA interference and cell type differentiation in skin cells from mice was first reported one month ago. However, the influence of food on the survival of all species is known to all serious scientists.

For example, see Schrodinger (1944). He linked the anti-entropic energy of sunlight from all energy-dependent biophysically constrained viral latency to healthy longevity before Roger Penrose (1991) mentioned this in his forward to the reprint edition:

How often do we still hear that quantum effects can have little relevance in the study of biology, or even that we eat food in order to gain energy?

In 1991, Penrose reduced the systems complexity of biophysically constrained top-down energy-dependent viral latency to the question of where the energy in a hydrogen atom comes from.comes from. Schrodinger suggested it came from sunlight in an attempt to stop the pseudoscientific nonsense about mutations that was touted after de Vries defined “mutation” in 1902. So far, no experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect has limited the claims about mutations and evolution that are made by biologically uninformed theorists.

See for comparison:

OLYMPUS experiment sheds light on structure of protons

A mystery concerning the structure of protons is a step closer to being solved, thanks to a seven-year experiment led by researchers at MIT. Credit: Christine Daniloff/MIT

Hard Two-Photon Contribution to Elastic Lepton-Proton Scattering Determined by the OLYMPUS Experiment (March 3, 2017)

The resulting values of R2γ, presented here for a wide range of virtual photon polarization 0.456<ε<0.978, are smaller than some hadronic two-photon exchange calculations predict, but are in reasonable agreement with a subtracted dispersion model and a phenomenological fit to the form factor data.

The phenomenological fit links the claims of Schrodinger and concerns of Penrose to this report on the Lepton-Proton Scattering. The title includes the joke about the link from sunlight to evolution that Dobzansky (1973) reported as: Nothing in Biology Makes Any Sense Except in the Light of Evolution. Dobzhansky’s clever creationist attack on neo-Darwinian theorists, who failed to link the creation of the sun to all biologically-based cause and effect went virtually unnoticed despite his claim:

I am a creationist and an evolutionist. Evolution is God’s, or Nature’s, method of Creation.

No experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect links Dobzhansky’s claims about amino acid substitutions to evolution. For contrast, all claims made by other serious scientists link sunlight to energy-dependent changes in angstroms to ecosystems in all living genera.

The two-photon contribution to the structure of protons and the biophysically constrained functional structure of supercoiled DNA was reported as:

OLYMPUS experiment sheds light on structure of protons

…experiments had previously led researchers to assume that the electric and magnetic charge distributions are the same, and that one photon—an elementary particle of light—is exchanged when the protons interact with the bombarding electrons.

…two photons are indeed exchanged during electron-proton interactions.

However, unlike the theoretical predictions, analysis of the OLYMPUS measurements suggests that, most of the time, only one of the photons has high energy, while the other must carry very little energy indeed…

Natural selection for the higher energy photon is the most likely link from the anti-entropic effects of sunlight to energy-dependent codon optimality and cell type differentiation in all living genera via the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction and endogenous RNA interference.
The links from higher energy photons to energy-dependent changes in chirality and autophagy extend what is known about RNA-mediated DNA repair. The molecular mechanisms of DNA repair helped to establish sunlight as the energy source for hydrogen-atom transfer in DNA base pairs in solution. The most recent report on one carbon metabolism also extends what is known about subatomic particles to the creation of the energy in hydrogen atoms and differences in the structure of teeth.
See: Evidence for dietary change but not landscape use in South African early hominins (2012)
Reported as: Millions of years of evolutionary history recorded in teeth (March 3, 2017)
The nonsense about the evolutionary history was refuted in 2013. See: System-wide Rewiring Underlies Behavioral Differences in Predatory and Bacterial-Feeding Nematodes
A change in diet was linked to differences in C. elegans and a predatory nematode with teeth. They claimed that the differences emerged during 200 million years, but no experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect has ever supported such ridiculous claims.
See also:
Subatomic Particles, Part 1: Leptons 
Subatomic Particles, Part 2: Baryons, the Substance of the Cosmos
Subatomic Particles, Part 3: Mesons
See also: Feedback loops link odor and pheromone signaling with reproduction

Please place the feedback loops into the context of how PCR applications are linked to what is known about cell type differentiation via virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA (mRNA), or linked by nutrient energy-dependent endogenous RNA interference to healthy longevity.

A snapshot of the most common PCR application

1) “Another possible application: looking for an RNA target, either viral or an endogenous mRNA.”
2) “…the IC [internal control] should be RNA to reflect the desired sample type.”
3) Conclusion: An understanding of the overall method workflow and some of the possible causes of false positive or negative results is thus beneficial in appropriately interpreting test results in the full clinical context.The light energy as information-induced de novo creation of RNA, protein, and lipid precursors links the common origin of amino acids to cell type differentiation in all living genera via endogenous RNA interference and the physiology of reproduction, which links supercoiled DNA to chromosomal inheritance.
See: Common origins of RNA, protein and lipid precursors in a cyanosulfidic protometabolism
John Brunstein indirectly suggests that supercoiled DNA prevents mutation-driven evolution. Unless the mutations can be linked from amino acid substitutions to pathology, he also seems to also be suggesting that neo-Darwinian theories are sources of errors.  Researchers are virtually guaranteed to fail, if they start with theories and try to link the possible causes of energy-dependent  false positive or negative results from the National Microbiome Initiative cell type differentiation in the context of the Precision Medicine Initiative.
I hope that someone like John Brunstein will comment on facts about the degradation of messenger RNA (mRNA). For example, virus-driven energy theft appears to link mRNA degradation to all pathology.  If he does not agree, I hope he knows of an alternative model that links energy-dependent RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions to all healthy longevity and something else to all pathology.
In any case,  I believe it is past time to eliminate neo-Darwinian theories, which link beneficial mutations to the stability of organized genomes in all living genera, but link amino acid substitutions to the stability of viruses.
See: Substitutions Near the Receptor Binding Site Determine Major Antigenic Change During Influenza Virus Evolution

The major antigenic changes of the influenza virus are primarily caused by a single amino acid near the receptor binding site.

See for comparison: Perhaps no single tool in the human arsenal explains our existence more than fire.

Watch Jason Silva tell you about the importance of fire in an attempt to link the pseudoscientific nonsense touted by theorists to survival of all species except those that do not need to eat. Those species must have emerged and automagically evolved to become people like Jason Silva who can tell others how that happened, but won’t.

He can tell others about the importance of fire. Watch as everyone else in the world starts to link energy-dependent endogenous RNA interference to biophysically constrained gene activation and link virus-driven energy theft to all pathology during the cell type differentiation of all species from microbes to humans.

See for example: Services – QuantSeq 3’ mRNA-Seq Libraries

Lexogen provides a fully integrated service-workflow for generation of QuantSeq 3’ mRNA-Seq libraries, multiplexed sequencing, and data analysis. QuantSeq libraries are produced from total RNA to yield Illumina-compatible sequences close to the 3’ end of polyadenylated RNA.

Then wait for someone to tell you more about the importance of fire.

See also this video representation of the link from sunlight to biodiversity in marine life.
Alternatively, place everything known about energy-dependent RNA-mediated cell type differentiation back into the context of “Nature.”
See: Nature Fights Back Against Gene Editing
Then, stop calling it “Nature” and learn what serious scientists already know about the energy-dependent links from angstroms to ecosystems in all living genera. If not, now that the Allen Institute has linked food energy as information to brain development, you will be asked to tell others how “Nature” created everything from subatomic particles to the hydrogen-atom energy. Then, the next question will be about how the energy is transferred in DNA base pairs in solution to allow natural selection for energy-dependent codon optimality and the physiology of reproduction in all living genera.
See also: The Persistent Contributions of RNA to Eukaryotic Gen(om)e Architecture and Cellular Function
See also: A Revised Tree of Life
See also: A Chat with Leeuwenhoek Medalist Jeffery Errington

Suzan Mazur: Do viruses play a role in regulating L-form bacteria?

Jeffery Errington: That’s a good question. Of course, much of the research on bacteriophages has shown that they tend to bind to components of the cell wall, so certainly you’d anticipate that L-forms would be resistant to many forms of virus. But I don’t know if much work has been done on this.

Anyone who does not know how much experimental evidence links food energy to all biodiversity via the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction is not likely to know enough about anything that could be linked from bacteriophages to all pathology via the degradation of messenger RNA.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: