Cell type assembly and the space-time continuum

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: July 24, 2017

Summary:

The time to adopt energy-dependent cell type assembly as the unit of cognition was in 1944, when Schrodinger published “What is Life.” By the time Roger Penrose made his comment in the reprint edition, everyone else was too late.

Penrose wrote: “How often do we still hear that quantum effects can have little relevance in the study of biology, or even that we eat food in order to gain energy?” (Roger Penrose 8 August 1991)

See: Time (and space) in the hippocampus  Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Volume 17, October 2017, Pages 65-70 by Howard EichenbaumEichenbaum has published 227 articles.

Many of them attest to the fact that energy-dependent RNA-mediated cell type assembly is the key to cognition.

See for example:  Barlow versus Hebb: When is it time to abandon the notion of feature detectors and adopt the cell assembly as the unit of cognition?

The time to adopt energy-dependent cell type assembly as the unit of cognition was in 1944, when Schrodinger published “What is Life.” By the time Roger Penrose made his comment in the reprint edition, everyone else was too late.

Penrose wrote: “How often do we still hear that quantum effects can have little relevance in the study of biology, or even that we eat food in order to gain energy?” (Roger Penrose 8 August 1991)

Decades earlier, Feynman claimed that the different measures of energy that failed to link what organisms eat to all biophysically constrained life on Earth were examples of human idiocy. See: Food energy

Earlier this year, Wen Zhou’s group published Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception after I presented: Energy as information and constrained endogenous RNA interference

In the American Legion Magazine (August 2017), Joe Plenzler introduces “Powered by Veterans” with the claim “It is often said that you are what you eat.” He then addresses the energy-dependent link from changes in base pairs to all biophysically constrained biodiversity. This was the subject that was detailed in Structural diversity of supercoiled DNA

Joe Plenzler cannot be expected to mention that the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA is what must be biophysically constrained. But see: Cytosis: A Cell Biology Board Game “A board game taking place inside a human cell! Players compete to build enzymes, hormones and receptors and fend off attacking Viruses!”
Protection from attacking viruses is food energy-dependent and RNA-mediated.
See for comparison:
James V. Kohl: “Evolution by natural selection cannot be the outcome if something is not first selected. Selection is always for nutrients. It is as simple as that.”

Jay R. Feierman:Variation is not nutrient availability and the something that is doing the selecting is not the individual organism. A feature of an educated person is to realize what they do not know. Sadly, you don’t know that you have an incorrect understanding [of] Darwinian biological evolution.

See for comparison: Ghosts and ghouls haunt the living with a message about life
Conclusion:

The dead are primally dangerous; we need them to stay where they are, safely quarantined, in a parallel universe to ours.

What message is being sent by biologically uninformed science idiots to those whom might believe that the dead are safely quarantined in a parallel universe to ours?

See also: In saliva, clues to a ‘ghost’ species of ancient human

Why aren’t these ghosts safely quarantined, in a parallel universe to ours?

 


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: