Robert Sapolsky’s legacy of atheistic pseudoscientific nonsense

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: August 12, 2017

Summary: Not only does everything known to serious scientists about energy link RNA synthesis to life, everything McEwen and others have published links nutrient stress and/or social stress to the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA and all pathology.
As moderator of the International Society for Human Ethology (ISHE), a not-for-profit scientific organization that consistently touts pseudoscientific nonsense in the context of neo-Darwinian evolution, Jay R. Feierman’s attacks on the works of serous scientists are increasing in frequency and in magnitude. Yesterday, he posted this link to a series of 25 lectures by Robert Sapolsky.  You could spend ~25 hours to learn what Sapolsky was teaching to students until 2011, or ignore everything he has claimed because he has been teaching atheistic pseudoscientific nonsense in the context of neo-Darwinian theory.

Today, Jay F. Feierman’s attacks on the works of serous scientists began with this:
Examining non-LTR retrotransposons in the context of the evolving primate brain

Although all mutational types have worked in concert with evolutionary forces to generate the current human brain, in this review we will explore the impact of mobile elements…

Robert Sapolsky may be responsible for many of these ridiculous reports on the evolving primate brain. Sapolsky studied under Bruce McEwen, but Sapolsky failed to link energy as information from an endogenous substrate in all cell types to the light-activated creation of ATP and the creation of RNA in microbes like P. fluorescens.
With exposure to ultraviolet light, this species (P. fluorescens) fluoresces. The weekend resurrection of the bacterial flagellum was also reported in this species. The energy-dependent physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction links the creation of the sun from the creation of ATP and the creation of RNA to the weekend resurrection of an irreducibly complex functional structure and all biophysically constrained biodiversity on Earth via McEwen et al., (1964). Dependence of RNA synthesis in isolated thymus nuclei on glycolysis, oxidative carbohydrate catabolism and a type of “oxidative phosphorylation”
Not only does everything known to serious scientists about energy link RNA synthesis to life, everything McEwen and others have published links nutrient stress and/or social stress to the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA and all pathology.
Sapolsky is reported to be an atheist in a Wikipedia entry. That should not matter to anyone who is capable of linking quantized energy from the sense of smell in bacteria to our visual perception of mass and energy in the context of the space-time continuum. See: Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception But, for those of us who have followed McEwen’s lead, and done that, Sapolsky’s lectures attest to his atheistic ignorance of biologically-based cause and effect.
His lectures can be viewed as examples of the human idiocy that Feynman mentioned in the context of the different measures used to make claims about energy as information. The origin of information still appears to come from the sun despite the fact that Feynman used the example of food energy. The history of publications on how the virus-driven energy theft of quantized energy has been linked from mutations to all pathology now includes information about how human endogenous retroviruses must be biophysically constrained.
The information is linked from energy as information to the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction in Bombyx mori to the control of cellular processing in mammals by everything I have published since 1995 and everything known about the creation of the innate immune system in bacteria (CRISPR). The works of those who claim that the emergence of energy and “evolution did it” can be compared to the works of serious scientists.
See for examples: Human pheromones and food odors: epigenetic influences on the socioaffective nature of evolved behaviors (2012)
Transposable-element associated small RNAs in Bombyx mori genome (2012)
Endogenous MOV10 inhibits the retrotransposition of endogenous retroelements but not the replication of exogenous retroviruses (2012)
Control of mammalian retrotransposons by cellular RNA processing activities (2014)
Protein-Coding Genes’ Retrocopies and Their Functions (2017)
Identification and characterization of two putative microRNAs encoded by Bombyx mori cypovirus (2017)

This is the first report that an insect double stranded RNA virus may generate miRNAs and the results obtained will benefit the future study of the functions of BmCPV-encoded miRNAs on viral replication and virus-host interaction.

Pheromones (Ectohormones) in Insects (1959)

Independently of Butenandt & Hecker (14, 50), the fractionation of Bombyx extracts and purification of the pheromone was also reported on by Makino et at. (71).

Effects of Carnitine on Fatty-Acid Oxidation by Muscle (1959) by FRITZ, IRVING B. and MCEWEN, BRUCE
Since 1959, McEwen and many others have linked food energy and pheromones to the biophysically constrained viral latency that ensures the survival of all species.  See also: Feedback loops link odor and pheromone signaling with reproduction
Since the time I met him in 1995, Jay R. Feierman has contributed to the unnecessary suffering and premature death of thousands via his misrepresentations of the facts about food energy-dependent pheromone-controlled RNA-mediated cell type differentiation.
See: Environment and Neurodegenerative Diseases: an Update on miRNA Role
I’m beginning to think that the most obvious way to prevent the deaths by suicide of our veterans is not something that will be discussed in any scientific forum or on most forms of social media.
See for comparison:
Jay R. Feierman: Variation is not nutrient availability and the something that is doing the selecting is not the individual organism. A feature of an educated person is to realize what they do not know. Sadly, you don’t know that you have an incorrect understanding [of] Darwinian biological evolution.
Jay R. Feierman: I am absolutely certain that if you showed this statement to any professor of biology or genetics in any accredited university anywhere in the world that 100% of them would say that “Random mutations are the substrate upon which directional natural selection acts” is a correct and true statement.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: