Predicting who wins the 2017 Nobel Prizes (2)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: October 2, 2017

Summary: Endogenous RNA interference is the energy-dependent epigenetic link from the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction to biophysically constrained viral latency. The stress-linked virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA has been linked to all pathology.
Three Americans win Nobel medicine prize for body rhythm work [But they failed to link Americanism to Creationism]

I predicted that Wen Zhou would win for linking the energy-dependent creation of G protein-coupled receptors to all biodiversity via olfaction and the space-time continuum in the context of RNA-mediated cell type differentiation via the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction. See: Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception. 
She returned to China after training in the United States of America, but is a good example of someone who appears to practice Americanism, which is an ideology that appears to be integrated into her research. I do not know what people in China refer to in the context of this ideology.

In the words of Theodore Roosevelt, “Americanism is a question of spirit, conviction, and purpose, not of creed or birthplace.”[3]

After Ben Feringa (Chemistry/chirality) and Yoshinora Ohsumi (Physiology or Medicine/autophagy) won last year, I thought that all gene-centric nonsense would be eliminated. It became perfectly clear that energy-dependent changes in chirality must be linked to autophagy, which protects all organized genomes from the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA.
Instead, see:

Excerpt 1) The awardees’ work stems back to 1984, when Rosbash and Hall, who was then also at Brandeis, along with Young isolated the “period gene” in fruit flies. Hall and Rosbash found that a protein encoded by the gene accumulated during the night and degraded during daytime. A decade later, Young discovered another “clock gene.”

Excerpt 2) “The paradigm-shifting discoveries by the laureates established key mechanisms for the biological clock,” the Nobel Assembly said in its prize statement.

See for comparison: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1973 Karl von Frisch, Konrad Lorenz and Nikolaas Tinbergen

for their discoveries concerning organization and elicitation of individual and social behaviour patterns.

The organization and elicitation of individual social patterns of behavior is energy-dependent and it links what organisms eat to the metabolism that links the energy to the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction in species from microbes to humans.
Since 1973,  and especially during the past 13 years, there has not been a gene-centric theory that has successful been linked to a paradigm shift. For example, all paradigm-shifting Nobel Prizes in Physiology or Medicine during the past 13 years have linked the energy-dependent creation of ATP and the creation of messenger RNA to protection from the virus-driven energy theft that serious scientists have linked from the degradation of messenger RNA to all pathology.
See for examples:
2016: Yoshinori Ohsumi of Japan for his work on autophagy—a process whereby cells “eat themselves”—which when disrupted can cause Parkinson’s and diabetes.
2015: William Campbell (US citizen born in Ireland) and Satoshi Omura (Japan), Tu Youyou (China) for unlocking treatments for malaria and roundworm.
2014: John O’Keefe (Britain, US), Edvard I. Moser and May-Britt Moser (Norway) for discovering how the brain navigates with an “inner GPS”.
2013: Thomas C. Suedhof (US citizen born in Germany), James E. Rothman and Randy W. Schekman (US) for work on how the cell organises its transport system.
2012: Shinya Yamanaka (Japan) and John B. Gurdon (Britain) for discoveries showing how adult cells can be transformed back into stem cells.
2011: Bruce Beutler (US), Jules Hoffmann (French citizen born in Luxembourg) and Ralph Steinman (Canada) for work on the body’s immune system.
2010: Robert G. Edwards (Britain) for the development of in-vitro fertilisation.
2009: Elizabeth Blackburn (Australia-US), Carol Greider and Jack Szostak (US) for discovering how chromosomes are protected by telomeres, a key factor in the ageing process.
2008: Harald zur Hausen (Germany), Francoise Barre-Sinoussi and Luc Montagnier (France) for work on the viruses causing cervical cancer and AIDS.
2007 Mario R. Capecchi, Sir Martin J. Evans and Oliver Smithies for their discoveries of principles for introducing specific gene modifications in mice by the use of embryonic stem cells.
2006 Andrew Z. Fire and Craig C. Mello for their discovery of RNA interference – gene silencing by double-stranded RNA.
2005 Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warren for their discovery of the bacterium Helicobacter pylori and its role in gastritis and peptic ulcer disease.
2004 Richard Axel (US) and Linda Buck (US) for their discoveries of “odorant receptors and the organization of the olfactory system.
Endogenous RNA interference is the energy-dependent epigenetic link from the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction to biophysically constrained viral latency. The stress-linked virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA has been linked to all pathology.
Addendum 1)
This morning I spoke with a 10-year veteran who had served in Iraq. He was not happy with the treatment for PTSD that he was receiving from the VA because he and his wife know he is getting worse (e.g., hyper-vigilance and more nightmares).

He has a 20% disability and my antagonists are causing it to get worse with their claims that my life’s works are “bullspit” and/or that “nobody cares.”
How can anyone convince a veteran that people care at a time when most will not take the time to watch a short video like this one?  Superbugs, Bacteriophages and Phage Therapy: An Interview with James Kohl Published on 17 May 2017
See for comparison:3/09/17 Jay Feierman: One can’t have Darwinian evolution by natural selection without either “random” mutations or directional selection. They are both necessary, proximate, contributing causes for genes and the proteins they code for changing in frequency over time in a population and by which the population becomes adaptively configured to the current environment.
Adaptations are food energy-dependent and biophysically constrained by the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction in species from microbes to humans.The claim that populations are adaptively configured are nothing more than pseudoscientific nonsense.

If you let our veterans, as individuals, continue to think they are less than human because a mutation or something else causes their failure to adapt to the challenges of life after returning from military service overseas, how will you convince yourself that you are not contributing to the death rate by suicide?

Addendum 2) Las Vegas Shooting: Live Updates (with video)

Other lawmakers woke up to the news and offered thoughts and prayers. Governor Brian Sandoval of Nevada called the shooting a “heinous act of violence.”

All heinous acts of violence are caused by the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA, not by the natural selection for mutations as claimed in Mutation-Driven Evolution

(2) Natural selection is for saving advantageous mutations and eliminating harmful mutations. Selective advantage of the mutation is determined by the type of DNA change, and therefore natural selection is an evolutionary process initiated by mutation.

See for comparison: Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model

…the model represented here is consistent with what is known about the epigenetic effects of ecologically important nutrients and pheromones on the adaptively evolved behavior of species from microbes to man. Minimally, this model can be compared to any other factual representations of epigenesis and epistasis for determination of the best scientific ‘fit’.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: