Reporting new scientific truths is not allowed in the USA

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: November 29, 2017

(click to enlarge)

Summary: If we keep training serious scientists in the United States but force them to return to their homeland to report new scientific truths, our Homeland Security will suffer from the ignorance of pseudoscientists who are still touting ridiculous claims about mutations and evolution.

A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.

Every great scientific truth goes through three stages. First, people say it conflicts with the Bible. Next they say it has been discovered before. Lastly they say they always believed it.

Sugar industry withheld evidence of sucrose’s health effects nearly 50 years ago

The results suggest that the current debate on the relative effects of sugar vs. starch may be rooted in more than 60 years of industry manipulation of science. Last year, the Sugar Association criticized a mouse study suggesting a link between sugar and increased tumor growth and metastasis, saying that “no credible link between ingested sugars and cancer has been established.”

First question: Why would they lie about a thing like that?

Second question: Who taught you to believe in them?

See also: Psychiatric Fallout From Toxic Exposure October 21, 2016 Posted to the Psychiatry Research Yahoo Group on November 25, 2017

Face-saving attempts will continue to be made by everyone who taught anyone else to believe in the pseudoscientific nonsense about random mutations and evolution. Clearly, psychiatrists decided it was good for business to ensure a decline in mental health that should have been attributed to the effects of sugar.

I recognized the obvious link from glucose levels to triglycerides before the nonsense about cholesterol and heart disease became a means to support the medical practices of pill prescribing physicians. Only diabetics had levels of triglycerides that left a chalky-white to pink color in their plasma or serum. Ultracentrifugation was sometimes required or chemical “clearing” with mathematical corrections in order to report accurate results.

Study: Autism Linked with Different Reactions to Chemical Signals (senior author Noam Sobel, Israel).

Responses to compounds in human sweat may help explain why people with autism spectrum disorder tend to struggle with social cues.

See also: Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception (senior author Wen Zhou, China)
If we keep training serious scientists in the United States but force them to return to their homeland to report new scientific truths, our Homeland Security will suffer from the ignorance of pseudoscientists who are still touting ridiculous claims about mutations and evolution.
https://www.cc.com/video-clips/sz2odd/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-greg-bear
Sci-fi author Greg Bear tells Jon about the not-so-distant future of technology and helping Homeland Security.
This is not funny anymore:
See also: The vibrational theory of olfaction for the win
Compare the facts to this ridiculous representation of the virus-driven evolution of human heterosexual love: VIRUS EVOLUTION ( AMAZING DOCUMENTARY)
In his science fiction novels from 1999 and 2003, Greg Bear linked what was known about biophysically constrained food energy-dependent pheromone-controlled ecological adaptations to the creation of a new more intelligent human subspecies that communicated with pheromones. They adapted to the virus-driven degradation of their messenger RNA, which has been linked from mutations to all pathology in species from archaea to non-human primates. Everything known to all serious scientists about biophysically constrained viral latency has since been placed into the context of refutations of neo-Darwinian pseudoscientific nonsense.
For a historical approach to the overwhelming ignorance of biologically uninformed theorists, see:

“The Darwin Code: Intelligent Design without God”

Perhaps the most intriguing method of gene swapping in bacteria is the bacteriophage, or bacterial virus. Bacteriophages–phages for short–can either kill large numbers of host bacteria, reproducing rapidly, or lie dormant in the bacterial chromosome until the time is right for expression and release. Lytic phages almost invariably kill their hosts. But these latter types–known as lysogenic phages–can actually transport useful genes between hosts, and not just randomly, but in a targeted fashion.

But remember that the quality of RNA begins with its energy-dependent creation and researchers recently made the claim that they had …revealed a surprising relationship between dementia and decreased quality of RNA—a key player in gene expression—in the more aged brain.
The decreased quality of the RNA has also been linked to the creation of the death gene via what is known about glioblastoma. A Harvard and MIT trained physicist reported that fact to me, and I could hardly believe how easy it was to confirm it that Abcam researchers knew about it ~20 years ago.
See: Reduced expression of brain-enriched microRNAs in glioblastomas permits targeted regulation of a cell death gene
See also: A Concise Review of MicroRNA Exploring the Insights of MicroRNA Regulations in Bacterial, Viral and Metabolic Diseases

I look forward to the day when serious scientists in the United States can report their refutations of neo-Darwinian pseudoscientific nonsense without being ostracized by claims that serious scientists exist on the fringes of what is known to all other serious scientists in the world. The virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA links mutations to all pathology, not to the evolution of one species from another.

0 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Reporting new scientific truths is not allowed in the USA

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts:

Subscribe

Important Pages

Connect