Chemogenetic kinetics (4): Darwinism vs neo-Darwinism

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: September 24, 2019

The paradigm shift in the molecular epigenetics section of  From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior has turned neo-Darwinists into Darwinists who link energy-dependent “conditions of life” to the prevention of virus-driven hecatombic evolution.
See:  Virus-mediated archaeal hecatomb in the deep seafloor for comparison to  Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean.
Cancer researchers now try to link effective treatments to Darwin’s “conditions of life,” which require food energy-dependent constraints on the physiology of reproduction.
Cancer treatment innovators discover Charles Darwin 6/13/19

…we hope the investigation of cancer evolution can free itself of its genetic shackles. Darwinian dynamics in cancer, as in all of nature, are fundamentally governed by environmental selection forces interacting with the cellular phenotypes. Genes, as the ‘mechanism of inheritance’ for adaptive strategies, serve as a history of prior evolution but are not necessarily the fundamental drivers of those dynamics—in other words, they are more often the consequences rather than the cause of a cancer cell’s resistance to treatment.

The Institute for Cancer Research – London,  claims to bring insights from physics, AI and data into cancer science. Their claims follow what is currently known about how Darwin’s energy-dependent “conditions of life” linked natural selection for food to biophysically constrained viral latency in Combating Evolution to Fight Disease 3/7/14
All drug discovery has been placed back into the context of epigenetic effects on biophysically constrained RNA-mediated cell type differentiation by Darwinists. The Darwinists start with the Creation of energy to refute neo-Darwinian nonsense. The pseudoscientific nonsense starts with links from mutations to evolution. Neo-Darwinists are stupid.
There is only one genetic code “The Darwin Code” + it is energy-dependent. Viruses steal the energy.
See: The Darwin Code
See also: Regulatory roles of the miR-200 family in neurodegenerative diseases 9/10/19

miR-200 family members are aberrantly expressed in several neurodegenerative diseases, participating in various cellular processes including beta-amyloid (Aβ) secretion, alpha-synuclein aggregation and DNA repair

But see: A self-assembled peptide nucleic acid–microRNA nanocomplex for dual modulation of cancer-related microRNAs 1/23/19
DNA repair is energy dependent. Nothing self-assembles itself.
See: UV-Induced Charge Transfer States in DNA Promote Sequence Selective Self-Repair (1/10/15)
The light-activated assembly of the microRNA-RNA-peptide #nanocomplex links the Creation of nucleic acids to dual modulation of cancer-related microRNAs via food energy-dependent pheromone-controlled biophysically constrained viral latency.
See also: Scientific Dissent from Darwinism List: The Tip of an Iceberg 2/4/19

I recall a visit a colleague and I made to the office of a Nobel laureate in a relevant field who gruffly stated his own rejection of evolutionary theory but refused to say anything in public. He is not a young man. Given his senior status, you would think he’d have nothing to fear. Yet he was afraid.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: