microRNA-mediated election cycles (7)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: July 15, 2021

(click to enlarge)

Are multi-quasiparticle interactions important in molecular ionization? 3/28/21

GWΓ [calculations] offers a unified description across all relevant energy scales. Our results suggest that the multi-QP regime corresponds to dynamical correlations, which can be described via perturbation theory.

Few intelligent serious scientists understand the complexities of calculations needed to link God’s Creation of energy-as- information to biophysically constrained viral latency and healthy longevity across kingdoms. Most of them know what happens when a paradigm fails. Pseudoscientists know when they got stuck with a failed paradigm. They also know they cannot un-stuck themselves.

Cracking the genetic code of autoimmune disease 7/14/21

…SNPs associated with autoimmune disease mapped most closely to enhancers that are switched on in activated immune cells — especially helper T cells, which activate other immune cells.

Only known codes can be cracked. When theorists do not know the origin of the code, they cannot crack it.
See: Role of SNPs in the Biogenesis of Mature miRNAs 6/18/21

When the SNP types are “A” and “U,” SNP-pre-miRNA tend to process and generate canonical miRNA. The decrease in free energy caused by SNPs tends to alter the processing sites of mature miRNAs.

The virus-driven decrease in free energy has been linked from altered maturation of miRNAs to all pathology across kingdoms. Naturally occurring light-activated carbon fixation links miRNA biogenesis and maturation to biophysically constrained viral latency via the patent for protonated RNA interference, which is titled:
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering

5. Repetitive elements or endogenous viral elements can be targeted with engineered Cas+gRNA systems in microbes, plants, animals, or human cells to reduce deleterious transposition or to aid in sequencing or other analytic genomic/transcriptomic/proteomic/diagnostic tools (in which nearly identical copies can be problematic).

Given the obvious amount of scientific progress toward prevention or effective treatment of virus-driven diseases, I do not agree with advisers who say:
WHO should lead on genome-editing policy, advisers say

The WHO advisers called for consideration of how intellectual-property rights will affect pricing of genome-editing therapies…

See: Get Well in the RNAi Way-RNAi, A Billion Dollar Baby in Therapy

RNAi has targeted exogenous genes in models of viral infection…

Clearly, the intellectual property rights of George M. Church et. al., should have been considered by the WHO to determine whether he was withholding information about the cure or effective treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and cancers.
I seems that WHO and George M. Church et. al., collectively bastardized everything known about CRISPR Cas 9 technology. Have they profited from deaths rather than led the way to get well in the RNAi way? If RNAi is the way to get well, why haven’t they made claims similar to those made by all intelligent serious scientists, including those who work for National Defense?
See: Military programs aiming to end pandemics forever 4/11/21

This is not science fiction, this is science fact. We have the tools, we have the technology, to do this all right now.

WHO may not want the suffering masses to know about how to avoid premature death caused by viruses in species from microbes to humans. Obviously, the World Health Organization is not concerned about your health. If they were, you would already know why George M. Church et al., patented naturally occurring light-activated carbon fixation and protonated RNA interference.

Did WHO order the killer virus-linked “Code Red” to prevent the re-election of Donald J. Trump?