microRNA-mediated biodiversity (5)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: February 13, 2022

(click to enlarge)

Criticisms of the nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled evolutionary model 6/4/14

Editor’s note

The 2013 review article by James Vaughn Kohl published in Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology and criticized in the above Letter to the Editor was subjected to standard peer review and the revised version was accepted by me after it had been accepted by both reviewers.

Neo-Darwinian theorists still seem to think there is room for debate about the fact that nutrient stress and social stress have been linked to all virus-driven pathology. Today, I encountered two more fools.
Rarely do I get the chance to show that most theorists exemplify human idiocy. See my attempts to discuss what is known to all intelligent serious scientists with people such as:
1: Robert Boessenecker, Doctor of Whaleontology
and
2: Karen Poole, Assistant prof teaching human anatomy and studying dinosaurs (team Ornithischia).

2/13/22 Robert Boessenecker
What’s your problem with my graphic now?

Thanks for asking. It misrepresents the facts known to all intelligent serious scientists who have linked energy-dependent changes in microRNAs to sympatric speciation via claims about food energy-dependent pheromone-regulated genetic processes of chromosomal rearrangements.
I presciently started with “Focus on Structure to Verify Protein Function” https://offers.the-scientist.com/focus-on-structure-to-verify-protein-function-redshift-bio-poster which were linked to the pH-dependent origin of microRNA-mediated life 6000 years ago on 4/25/20 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7285048
https://t.co/4AnTlUUv7u

Karen Poole
Where can I find publications by these “intelligent serious scientists” about “energy-dependent changes in microRNAs”? I’d like to know more, but Google scholar isn’t finding anything?

Thanks for asking. More than 135,000 indexed published works can be found via this search for microRNA: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=microRNA&sort=date

Karen Poole
Yes, I’m familiar with miRNA. What do “energy-dependent changes in miRNA” have to do with (whale) evolution?

Thanks: “energy-dependent changes in miRNA” have been linked to 6000 years of ecological adaptations across kingdoms via the light-activated creation of different soil types. That fact forces theorists to run and hide. https://twitter.com/microRNApro/status/1492930771878912004/photo/1

Karen Poole
So, a process you can’t explain, that apparently occurs in soils within the last 6000 years explains the evolution of whales in the ocean over about 40 million years. Sure, makes total sense

I’ve detailed the microRNA-mediated processes. Where did you get the idea that whales evolved during processes that occurred over about 40 million years?
No experimental evidence of biologically based top-down causation supports such claims, and yet you seem to believe in them.

Karen Poole

I got the idea from geology. There’s plenty of empirical evidence in the fossil record, and experimental evidence for the decay rate of various radioactive isotopes allows us to assign ages to the rocks fossils are found in.

Thanks. See: https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/07/15/1905682116.long It links the impact of viral predation to regulation of global biogeochemical cycles and refutations of your claims about empirical and experimental evidence by turning your “evidence” of assigned ages into more examples of stupid theories.
The doctor of Whaleontology has since blocked me from seeing his tweets, but you can still find them via the links above. What will Karen Poole do?

Karen Poole
Cool paper, but it has nothing to do with whale evolution or radiometric dating, and does nothing to refute anything I or Bobby have said.