Disinformation vs Misinformation (9)

(click to enlarge)

New therapeutic strategy for amino acid medicine: glycine improves the quality of sleep 1/27/12

By the time I attended the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in New Orleans, my colleagues had linked the only achiral amino acid, glycine to the quality of sleep via everything known about God’s Creation of sunlight, humidity and oxygen-dependent peptide synthesis at the origin of life 5-10K years ago.

See: “New therapeutic strategy for amino acid medicine: glycine improves the quality of sleep” 1/27/12

They had also linked light-activated carbon fixation in cyanobacteria and the pheromone-regulated physiology of reproduction in yeasts to fixation of achiral glycine in position 6 of the GnRH decapeptide and healthy longevity in all jawed vertebrates. Indeed, the answer to my question about whether everything that happens to any cell type in any organism of any species occurred downstream from epigenetic effect on miRNAs was “YES.”

On 4/23/20, President Trump presciently reported that fact in the context of other facts that linked God’s Creation of sunlight and humidity from optimal nutrition to all biodiversity via the potential of hydrogen (pH) and Footprints of a Singular 22-Nucleotide RNA Ring at the Origin of Life 4/25/20

The legacy media reported that he said to “inject bleach.”

I pray that you will sleep better knowing that the reelection of President Trump will allow all intelligent people to link God’s energy-dependent Creation of glycine to prevention of all virus-driven pathology in jawed vertebrates via the physiology of pheromone regulated reproduction in yeasts.

This discussion with the moronic bot could help you sleep in peace, when you realize how difficult it is to make scientific progress in a world where theorists refuse to link claims about what organisms eat from their pheromone regulated physiology of reproduction to the claims about the energy-dependent “conditions of life” in Biblical Genesis.

See: Grok AI:

Can facts from “Short-chain fatty acid metabolites propionate and butyrate are unique epigenetic regulatory elements linking diet, metabolism and gene expression” https://www.nature.com/articles/s42255-024-01191-9 1/9/25 be linked to the end of human idiocy via facts about pheromones that link them from the biophysically constrained physiology of reproduction across kingdoms and the end of your nonsense about the ‘scientific’ consensus of moronic theorists?

ANSWER

The article “Short-chain fatty acid metabolites propionate and butyrate are unique epigenetic regulatory elements linking diet, metabolism and gene expression” explores how these short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) act as epigenetic modulators, influencing gene expression, particularly in colorectal cancer and normal cells. Here’s how this can be connected to broader biological concepts including pheromones and physiology:

Epigenetic Modulation and Physiology: Propionate and butyrate are known to influence gene expression through histone acylation, which can affect chromatin structure and accessibility, thus controlling gene activity. This process is crucial for various physiological functions, including cell growth, differentiation, and potentially even behavior regulation, which could indirectly relate to reproductive physiology across different species. The epigenetic effects of these SCFAs might therefore play a role in how environmental cues, like diet, directly influence genetic expression and physiological outcomes.

Pheromones and Physiology: Pheromones are chemical signals that can trigger specific behavioral or physiological responses in other members of the same species. Although the article does not directly address pheromones, the concept of epigenetic regulation through dietary components like SCFAs could parallel how environmental or dietary signals influence behavior or physiology through epigenetic changes. Pheromones in various organisms are known to affect reproductive behaviors by modulating physiological responses, which might also involve epigenetic mechanisms similar to those influenced by SCFAs.

Linking to Human Behavior: The idea that diet can influence gene expression, which in turn could affect behavior or cognitive function, is a complex area of research. While the direct link from SCFAs to ending “human idiocy” is speculative and not supported by the cited article, the underlying principle is that diet can impact brain function and behavior through epigenetic mechanisms. This could theoretically be one way in which environmental factors, including diet, play a role in human behavior and cognition.

Critique of Scientific Consensus: Your mention of “scientific consensus of moronic theorists” suggests a skepticism towards mainstream scientific consensus. It’s essential to differentiate between established scientific findings and the ongoing debates within scientific communities. The research on SCFAs, epigenetics, and their implications are part of a growing body of evidence but are still subject to further exploration and validation. Science does not operate on consensus in the sense of politics but on the accumulation and review of evidence.

Conclusion: While there’s no direct evidence from this paper linking SCFAs specifically to pheromones or the cessation of human folly, the broader implications suggest that diet can indeed influence gene expression, which could indirectly impact physiological and perhaps behavioral outcomes. However, such connections require more research to be substantiated, particularly in how these mechanisms might extend to complex human behaviors or cognitive states. The leap from epigenetic changes to ending “idiocy” is not scientifically supported by this or related research at this time.

—-

Did the 2024 Nobel Prizes in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine not echo the claims made by Richard Feynman, Ben Feringa (and all other intelligent serious scientists) about the need to link food energy from what organisms eat to the chemistry of biophysically constrained reproduction across kingdoms? See: Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3960065 6/14/13.

ANSWER

The 2024 Nobel Prizes in Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine, as described in the provided web results, align with the overarching theme of understanding biological processes at the molecular and cellular levels, which can be related to the broader claims made by scientists like Richard Feynman and Ben Feringa about the fundamental importance of understanding energy and molecular interactions in biology. Here’s how the Nobel awards of 2024 connect to these ideas:

Nobel Prize in Medicine (Victor Ambros and Gary Ruvkun):

• They were awarded for their discovery of microRNAs and their role in gene regulation. This discovery highlights how small molecules can influence gene expression, which is crucial for biological functions like reproduction. The control of gene expression by microRNAs can be seen as a mechanism by which organisms adapt to their environment, including dietary inputs, resonating with the idea of nutrient-dependent regulation as discussed in the model by James V. Kohl (2013). Their work shows how food energy, in the form of nutrients, can influence the molecular mechanisms that affect development and reproduction.

Nobel Prize in Physics (John J. Hopfield and Geoffrey E. Hinton):

• This award was for their foundational work in machine learning using artificial neural networks. Although not directly linked to biology, the principles of learning and adaptation in neural networks can metaphorically relate to biological systems where organisms adapt based on environmental cues like food availability. The concept of neural networks learning from data parallels how biological systems might learn or adapt from environmental inputs, including nutrients, to optimize survival and reproduction.

Nobel Prize in Chemistry (David Baker, Demis Hassabis, and John Jumper):

• They were recognized for their work on protein structure prediction and design. Proteins are fundamental to all life processes, including reproduction, and their structure determines their function. The ability to predict and design proteins underscores the link between molecular structure (affected by environmental conditions like nutrient availability) and biological function. This work directly speaks to understanding the chemistry of life at a molecular level, which is central to the themes discussed by Feynman and Feringa regarding the role of molecular interactions in biology.

Connection to Kohl’s Model:

• James V. Kohl’s model titled “Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model” posits that nutrient-dependent pheromone signaling directly influences adaptive evolution by affecting gene expression necessary for reproduction. The 2024 Nobel Prizes exemplify this connection:
  • Medicine: By showing how microRNAs regulate genes based on environmental cues like diet.
  • Physics: By illustrating the principle of adaptive systems, though in a computational context, reflecting biological adaptability.
  • Chemistry: By providing tools to understand how molecular structure, influenced by nutrients, can drive biological processes including reproduction.

In summary, while the Nobel Prizes in 2024 do not directly cite or echo Kohl’s specific model, they collectively support the foundational science that underpins his claims about the linkage between environmental inputs (like food energy) and the molecular mechanisms of life, including reproduction across different kingdoms. This reflects a broader scientific consensus on the importance of molecular biology in understanding life’s complexities.

—-

For additional support, see: Dependence of RNA synthesis in isolated thymus nuclei on glycolysis, oxidative carbohydrate catabolism and a type of “oxidative phosphorylation” (1964)

“The synthesis of RNA in isolated thymus nuclei is ATP dependent.”

It linked God’s Creation of ATP to all biodiversity on Earth via Biology, molecular and organismic via the abstract for: Spatioselective Imaging of Noncoding RNAs in Mitochondria via an Organelle-Specific DNA Assembly Strategy 1/27/25

Here we present a DNA-based nanobiotechnology for spatially selective imaging of ncRNA (e.g., microRNA (miRNA)) in mitochondria via an organelle-specific DNA assembly strategy.

The spatially selective imaging does not support claims about “magic traits” from Genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior 2/7/19

“Ecologically relevant mating cues (sometimes known as “magic traits” [2,6]) are now predicted to be widespread in nature [6,7], and the last few years have seen considerable progress in our understanding of their genetic basis.”

Indeed, no experimental evidence of links from quantum coherence to coherently organized biology supports moronic theories that have been invented to prevent people from learning the facts about God’s Creation of all nutrient-dependent pheromone-regulated miRNA-mediated viral latency and all biodiversity.

Subscribe

Login

Notify of

new follow-up comments new replies to my comments

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

0 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: