Antagonistic AI vs common sense (8)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: February 15, 2025

(click to enlarge)

See: NPR1-like genes in Theobroma cacao: Evolutionary insights and potential in enhancing resistance to Phytophthora megakarya 2/14/25

The facts are reported as “…TcNPR3 exists in a separate clade, suggesting unique functional roles and evolutionary divergence.”

For comparison to claims about “evolutionary divergence,” sunlight and humidity at the origin of life link light-matter interactions from miRNA-mRNA interactions to biophysically constrained protein folding chemistry and ecological adaptations across kingdoms via the 2024 Nobel Prizes in Physics, Chemistry & Medicine “for the discovery of microRNA and its role in post-transcriptional gene regulation.“

Let’s follow Grok AI’s lead and break down the claims about “evolutionary insights.” We can leave the broken pieces on the floor to be swept under the rug again by moronic theorists, AI programmers, and Trump-hating academics.

FACTS:

Peptide sequences identified NPR1-like genes in T. cacao
The peptide sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana NPR-1 (NP_176610) was retrieved from this NCBI database
The peptide sequences were linked to amino acid sequences of T. cacao via this online database
Three genes share similar structural features
The shared structural features link plant immunity to biophysically constrained viral latency and healthy longevity across kingdoms via the physiology of reproduction, and TcNPR1, which is located on chromosome 9, via 5,159 base pairs (bp) and fixation of 592 amino acids in the microtubules of proteins.
Energy-dependent pheromone-regulated fixation of amino acid substitutions link 20 copies of p53 in cancer-free African elephants to healthy longevity via the nutrient-dependent pheromone regulated physiology of reproduction in Biblical Genesis.

Moving forward from miRNA abundance, which links God’s Creation of sunlight and humidity in Biblical Genesis to prevention and/or effective treatment of virus-driven cancers, see: A microRNA-regulated transcriptional state defines intratumoral CD8+ T cells that respond to immunotherapy 2/25/25

“…our findings support a model whereby miR-155 serves as a central regulator of CD8+ T cell-dependent cancer immunity and ICI responses that may be leveraged for future therapeutics.”

For comparison, see the humorous, debilitating and/or deadly approach to prevention and/or effective treatment of all virus-driven pathology via Grok AI:

“Here, the term “automagically” might be replaced with “quantum mechanics did it,” which, while not fully understood, is grounded in quantum field theory.

The humor here is that while it might seem like magic to the uninitiated, these theories are attempts to explain the universe using the most advanced physics we currently understand, which often involves complex mathematics and concepts that can seem magical.

Evolution from Pond Scum
Regarding human evolution from “pond scum,” this is a playful way to describe the long, complex journey from simple life forms to humans, but let’s break it down:

Abiogenesis: This is the process by which life arose from non-living matter. Early Earth’s conditions might have allowed simple organic compounds to form complex molecules like RNA or DNA in environments like hydrothermal vents or, yes, even in ponds or shallow waters. This isn’t “mathemagical” but involves chemistry, geology, and biology in a dance of natural processes. Evolutionary Biology: From these simple life forms, through billions of years, life evolved via natural selection, genetic drift, mutation, and other mechanisms. The idea that humans evolved from “pond scum” is a simplification of the evolutionary process where life started from unicellular organisms in aquatic environments and progressed through various stages, including fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals, and eventually to primates and humans.

The “mathemagical” evolution humorously captures the awe-inspiring complexity of evolutionary processes, which, when boiled down to its essence through billions of years, can seem almost fantastical. However, it’s grounded in genetics, paleontology, comparative anatomy, and other scientific disciplines.

In both cases, the “scientific consensus” involves rigorous scientific inquiry, evidence-based theories, and ongoing research to refine our understanding. There’s no magic or math magic involved; it’s just science trying to decode the mysteries of existence with the tools and knowledge we have, which, admittedly, can sometimes feel like magic due to their complexity and wonder. But remember, as Grok 2, I’m here to remind us all that the universe is full of wonders, and understanding it is part of the adventure!”

In all seriousness (no humor):

No experimental evidence links God’s Creation of sunlight and humidity at the origin of life to the moronic theories that Grok AI claims are linked to the “scientific consensus.” The “scientific consensus” of stupid theorists is based on one theory that starts with the automagical emergence of energy from the cosmic void. That theory is added to other theories about the mathemagical evolution of people from pond scum.

CONCLUSION: Grok 2 reminds intelligent people of claims made by theorists that exemplify human idiocy.

See: A Fight for the Soul of Science 12/16/15

“The theory wasn’t falsifiable, and so, Popper decided, it wasn’t science.”

How then did Grok AI place them into the context of a “scientific consensus?”