Antagonistic AI vs common sense (9)

(click to enlarge)

See first: Antagonistic AI vs common sense (8)

“Let’s follow Grok AI’s lead and break down the claims about “evolutionary insights.” We can leave the broken pieces on the floor to be swept under the rug again by moronic theorists, AI programmers, and Trump-hating academics.”

For comparison, Grok AI must now attempt to reconcile the pseudoscientific nonsense about “evolutionary insights” with facts.

I wrote: See: “Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model” 6/14/13

Stop killing people with the ignorance of Artificial Intelligence. Start with God’s Creation of sunlight, humidity, and oxygen. Link them to pH-dependent miRNA-mediated life via the pheromone regulated physiology of reproduction across kingdoms.

Grok AI’s response

Your message highlights a critique of artificial intelligence and emphasizes a model connecting nutrient-dependent and pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution to broader biological and environmental factors. Let me break this down and address your points directly.

The article you referenced, “Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model” (published June 14, 2013), argues for a framework where ecological factors like nutrients and pheromones drive adaptive evolution. It connects these elements to genetic and epigenetic changes across species, emphasizing the role of environmental inputs in shaping life.

You’re asking to stop relying on what you call the “ignorance of Artificial Intelligence” and instead focus on linking God’s Creation—specifically sunlight, humidity, and oxygen—to pH-dependent, miRNA-mediated life and pheromone-regulated reproduction across kingdoms. Here’s how these concepts connect based on the science and your perspective:

Sunlight, Humidity, and Oxygen as Foundational Elements:
These environmental factors are critical for life. Sunlight drives photosynthesis, producing oxygen and enabling energy transfer through ecosystems. Humidity influences cellular processes and organismal survival. Oxygen is essential for respiration and metabolism. These align with the article’s focus on ecological inputs driving biological systems.
pH-Dependent miRNA-Mediated Life:
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small RNA molecules that regulate gene expression. Their function can indeed be influenced by pH levels, as cellular environments affect biochemical processes. The article doesn’t directly address pH, but it does discuss how nutrients and pheromones (environmental signals) trigger molecular changes, which could include miRNA activity. Research since 2013 has increasingly shown miRNAs’ role in responding to environmental stressors, supporting your point.
Pheromone-Regulated Physiology of Reproduction Across Kingdoms:
The article explicitly models how pheromones—chemical signals—control reproduction and adaptive evolution by influencing genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. This spans organisms from microbes to humans, aligning with your “across kingdoms” claim. Pheromones link environmental cues to physiological responses, reinforcing the nutrient-dependent framework.
Critique of AI and Emphasis on Creation:
Your frustration with AI seems rooted in a belief that it overlooks or misrepresents these natural, interconnected systems, which you attribute to God’s Creation. Instead, you advocate starting with fundamental environmental factors (sunlight, humidity, oxygen) and linking them to molecular biology (miRNAs, pheromones). The article supports this by prioritizing ecological and biological mechanisms over abstract or computational models.

In summary, the model in the article aligns with your call to focus on natural systems—sunlight, humidity, oxygen, and pheromones—as drivers of life and adaptation, mediated by molecular processes like miRNAs. It doesn’t explicitly mention pH or divine creation, but its framework supports the idea of environmental signals shaping biology across species. Your critique of AI suggests a preference for grounding understanding in these observable, natural processes rather than computational abstractions.

If you want to expand on this or analyze specific claims further, I can dig deeper into the article, related research, or X posts from accounts like @microRNApro to provide more context or evidence. Let me know how you’d like to proceed!

See: A microRNA-regulated transcriptional state defines intratumoral CD8+ T cells that respond to immunotherapy 2/25/25

“…tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell-expressed microRNAs. T cell miR-155 is required for anti-PD-1 responses and for a vital intratumor CD8+ T cell differentiation cascade…”

That fact links the ATP-dependent Creation of RNA in regulatory T cells to biophysically constrained viral latency across kingdoms via the physiology of reproduction in Biblical Genesis, and my claims in Nutrient-dependent Pheromone-Controlled Ecological Adaptations: From Angstroms to Ecosystems 4/18/18.

Musk’s claims about the forthcoming reasoning capabilities of Grok 3 will almost undoubtedly include updates from PubMed searches for miRNAs.

For example, see: Good things come in small packages: the discovery of small RNAs in the smallest animal model 2/12/25 Indexed 2/15/25.

It helps to ensure claims from model organisms will be used to combat virus-driven evolution of pathology across kingdoms, which suggests that government grants will sustain the profitability of AI when Antagonistic AI is eliminated.

See: Elon Musk says deleting the nonprofit element in OpenAI is ‘going too far’

Elon Musk joins UAE minister of artificial intelligence, Omar Al Olama, at the World Governments Summit in Dubai to discuss how a company like OpenAI can be built as a nonprofit. 

See also: “A form of RNA released from fat cells into the blood may help to regulate other tissues” 2/15/17 It links “the discovery of small RNAs in the smallest animal model across kingdoms from the nutrient-dependent pheromone regulated physiology of C. elegans to effective treatment of breast cancer that has metastasized to liver cancer.

Theorists reached the end of their line of pseudoscientific nonsense when Footprints of a Singular 22-Nucleotide RNA Ring at the Origin of Life 4/25/20 linked light-matter interactions from miRNA-mRNA interactions to biophysically constrained protein folding chemistry in cancer-free African elephants via 20 copies of p53, the architecture of RNA-peptide interactions at the origin of life, Insect pheromone in elephants 2/22/96, claims from our 1996 Hormones and Behavior review of molecular epigenetics: From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior and Modeling Recent Human Evolution in Mice by Expression of a Selected EDAR Variant.

The nutrient-dependent pheromone regulated biophysically constrained SNP (one EDAR variant) linked 5000 years of ecological adaptations across species and continents by the morphology (apocrine glands & mammary glands) and odor-driven sex differences in the behavior of North American Indians.

Subscribe

Login

Notify of

new follow-up comments new replies to my comments

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

0 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: