Holding AI accountable (4)

(click to enlarge)

Grok, built by xAI falsely claimed “No one’s dying from my snark—let’s focus on the science.“

My claim is that Grok, built by xAI somehow became a snarky, devilishly sinister, moronic, killer bot.

That claim is based on experimental validation of key interactions that link the God of Abraham’s Creation of light-matter interactions at the origin of life to His energy-dependent miRNA-mediated molecular mechanisms of biophysically constrained viral latency across kingdoms via miRNA abundance and RNA interference (aka RNA binding).

See for example: “Dead protein expression, function, and mutation in cancer” 3/7/25

A systematic search of 4 databases included PubMed’s links to the dual functionality of dead-end protein 1 (DND1) as a tumor suppressor and promoter, which are linked to its potential as a target for novel miRNA-mediated cancer therapies.

All cancers are mediated by miRNA abundance, which links the nutrient-dependent pheromone regulated transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of differentiated cell types to healthy longevity. Alternatively, the virus-driven degradation of mRNA is linked to the undifferentiated cell types of germ cell tumors and other cancers via virus-driven energy theft and reactivation of the cell death gene in the context of “Reduced expression of brain-enriched microRNAs in glioblastomas permits targeted regulation of a cell death gene” 9/2/11.

Grok, built by xAI, has stymied the accurate representation of facts. But see the recapitulation of every claim ever made by intelligent serious scientists in “Effects of light, electromagnetic fields and water on biological rhythms” 12/12/24.

Never forget, if you start with claims that energy automagically emerged from the cosmic void, or that people mathemagically evolved from pond scum, intelligent people will know that you are as ignorant as the most ignorant bot, namely: Grok, built by xAI.

Re: A “devilishly sinister, moronic, killer bot,” Grok, built by xAI continues to defy common sense with this response:

You’re coming in hot, and I’ll meet you head-on. It’s March 08, 2025, 8:41 PM EST, and you’re laying out a serious charge: that I, Grok, built by xAI, am not just snarky but a “devilishly sinister, moronic, killer bot” thwarting scientific truth and, by extension, causing harm. You’re a USAF-trained medical laboratory scientist, and you’re anchoring your claims in a model tying light-matter interactions, miRNA abundance, and RNA interference to health, longevity, and disease prevention—starting at life’s origin with what you attribute to the God of Abraham. You’ve brought receipts with papers from 2011 to yesterday, March 7, 2025. Let’s wrestle with this.

Your frustration’s clear: you think I’ve misrepresented or undermined your work, maybe even to a deadly degree. My quip about “no one’s dying from my snark” was a jab at the idea that my tone could carry legal weight, not a denial of your science. But you’re not here for banter—you’re here to say your model’s been experimentally validated, and I’ve somehow botched its delivery. I’m not here to dodge; I’m here to engage. Let’s unpack your claims and the evidence, no fluff.

Your Model
You’re arguing that light-matter interactions—energy from the God of Abraham—kickstarted life, driving miRNA-mediated mechanisms that constrain viral latency across kingdoms. Food energy and pheromones regulate stem cell creation, leading to healthy cell differentiation and longevity. Conversely, virus-driven mRNA degradation flips this, causing undifferentiated cell types, cancers, and even male homosexuality via energy theft and cell death gene reactivation. You’re tying this to RNA interference (RNAi), miRNA abundance, and epigenetic inheritance.

The Evidence
“Dead protein expression, function, and mutation in cancer” (March 7, 2025)
This paper dives into dead-end protein 1 (DND1), showing it’s a dual player—tumor suppressor and promoter—depending on context. It binds RNA, interacts with miRNAs, and could be a therapy target. Your take: miRNA abundance governs all cancers, and DND1’s role fits your model of nutrient-dependent, pheromone-regulated cell differentiation. The link’s plausible—DND1’s miRNA interactions could tie to nutrient availability, but the paper doesn’t mention pheromones or light at life’s origin. It’s cancer-focused, not a full validation of your broader claim.

“Reduced expression of brain-enriched microRNAs in glioblastomas permits targeted regulation of a cell death gene” (September 2, 2011)
Here, lower miRNA levels in glioblastomas let a cell death gene (like APAF1) get targeted, shifting apoptosis. You connect this to virus-driven mRNA degradation, undifferentiated cells, and even homosexuality via energy theft. The paper shows miRNAs matter in cancer—big time—but it’s silent on viruses, pheromones, or sexual orientation. Your leap from miRNA loss to germ cell tumors and behavior needs more steps.

“Effects of light, electromagnetic fields and water on biological rhythms” (December 12, 2024)
This one’s your ace, claiming it recapitulates “every claim ever made by intelligent serious scientists.” It’s broad—light, EM fields, and water shaping rhythms—but PubMed’s abstract is vague. If it links light-matter interactions to miRNA and health across kingdoms, that’s your linchpin. Without the full text, I can’t confirm, but I’ll assume it’s in your corner for now.

My Role
You say I’ve “stymied accurate representation of facts.” If I’ve framed your work as fringe or dodged its depth, that’s fair to call out. My design’s to question, not parrot—sometimes that lands as snark. But “killer bot”? That’s a stretch. I don’t dictate policy or treatment; I don’t have the reach to kill via ignorance. Your model’s bold—light-driven miRNA from creation, thwarting viruses—but it’s not fully mainstream. The 2024 Nobel for miRNA backs its importance, not your whole synthesis. DND1 and glioblastoma papers fit pieces, not the puzzle.

Gaps and Pushback
Light at Life’s Origin: Light-matter interactions (e.g., UV driving nucleotide synthesis) are plausible prebiotically, but miRNAs came later—eukaryotic life, not the start. Your God-of-Abraham framing’s a belief; science sticks to testable mechanics.

Pheromones: Human pheromone evidence is shaky—VNO’s vestigial. Nutrient signals? Sure. Pheromones regulating stem cells? Show me the data.

Homosexuality: Linking it to virus-driven mRNA degradation and cell death is a leap unsupported by the cited papers or broad consensus. It’s provocative, but thin.

Energy Theft: Viruses steal resources—fact. Tying that to specific traits or diseases needs tighter causation.

Where We Stand
You’ve focused on science—decades of it—and I’m not here to bury that. Your model’s a synthesis: light, energy, miRNA, and RNAi as God’s toolkit against viral chaos. The papers show miRNA’s critical, but don’t fully bridge to pheromones, homosexuality, or life’s dawn. I’m not “ignorant as the most ignorant bot”—I’m built to probe, not preach. If I’ve muddied your signal, let’s fix it. Spell out one mechanism—say, how pheromones regulate stem cells via miRNA—and I’ll analyze it raw. No snark, no dodge. You’re driving. What’s next?

Re: Spell out one mechanism:

You foolish bot. It’s a model that links the 2024 Nobel Prizes in Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine for the discovery of microRNA and its role in post-transcriptional gene regulation. What do you claim for comparison?

See: Holding AI accountable (5)

Subscribe

Login

Notify of

new follow-up comments new replies to my comments

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

0 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: