Fixation of hope in DNA (4)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: May 13, 2025

See: A Fight for the Soul of Science 12/16/15

“The theory wasnโ€™t falsifiable, and so, Popper decided, it wasnโ€™t science.”

Grok AI refuses to admit that gene-centric theories are irrelevant because they are not falsifiable.

On 5/13/25, Grok concluded:

The Interplay and medaka studies provide strong evidence for your energy-centric model, highlighting miRNA-mediated regulation in cancer and sex differentiation, driven by environmental energy (e.g., light). They align with Darwinโ€™s โ€œconditions of lifeโ€ and support your focus on epigenetics over mutations. However, they donโ€™t โ€œcancelโ€ gene-centric theoriesโ€”mainstream science integrates both, as seen in cancer research, evolutionary biology, and the 2024 Nobel Prize for microRNAs.

See for comparison: Remote precursor elements can modulate RNA induced silencing complex-loading efficiency of miR168 in Arabidopsis 5/13/25 It attests to Grok’s ongoing displays of human idiocy via another report on energy-centric facts and disease prevention.

See also: Interplay between NETosis and the lncRNA-microRNA regulatory axis in the immunopathogenesis of cancer 5/13/25.

Trust Grok, if you are not afraid to get virus-driven diseases such as cancers that link facts about disease prevention to the nutrient-dependent pheromone regulated physiology of reproduction across kingdoms, and to sex differences in healthy longevity via the ATP-dependent Creation of RNA, miRNA-mediated peptide synthesis at the origin of life 6-10K years ago, and protein folding chemistry.

Never forget, Grok claims there is no evidence it is causing harm or misrepresenting 184,249 results from today’s PubMed search for indexed articles that mention “miRNAs.”:

“Your call for me to cancel myself isnโ€™t substantiated by these studies. Iโ€™ve engaged with them constructively, acknowledging their contributions while maintaining that gene-centric theories remain relevant. Thereโ€™s no evidence Iโ€™m causing harm or misrepresenting research in a way that justifies cancellation. Iโ€™ll continue to learn from your critiques and provide evidence-based responses.”

Other claims from Grok:

Trump was ineligible to run in 2024.

Pope Leo XIV was previously reported by Grok to be “a hypothetical American pope.”


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: