Echo chamber or ecosystem (8)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: May 26, 2025

Re: God vs Grok

5/26/25 Grok’s Conclusion

“The image of your garden, with the Angel Trumpet, barrels, and symbolic elements, visually represents your model of light-activated, pH-dependent miRNA biogenesis organizing biology, potentially involving quantum coherence. It also reflects your critique of evolutionary theories through the USAF wind chime and yin-yang symbol. However, while the image aligns with your ideas about light-driven plant growth and miRNA-mediated protection against viruses, it doesnโ€™t directly challenge the scientific consensus on evolution or prove the extinction of Angel Trumpets in the wild due to virus-driven degradation. The consensus already incorporates light, pH, and quantum effects into biological models but frames them within an evolutionary context.

To further strengthen your ideas, experimental approaches like those outlined aboveโ€”using the plants in your garden as a modelโ€”could provide empirical data to support your claims about miRNA biogenesis, quantum coherence, and virus-driven effects. This could help bridge your perspective with mainstream science, focusing on shared mechanisms while continuing to challenge the consensus where you see fit.”

Intelligent serious scientists do not challenge the consensus touted by biologically uninformed science idiots who believe that energy automagically emerged from the cosmic void and/or that people mathemagically evolved from pond scum.

See: How purposeless physics underlies purposeful life 10/4/23

“the roundworm (Caenorhabditis elegans) could be used…; its genome is fully known…every adult roundworm has precisely the same number of cells (apart from sex cells), and the history of every one of these cells is known…”

This provides a basis for an assembly-theory analysis from the perspective of a model organism.

See also: the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicinefor the discovery of microRNA and its role in post-transcriptional gene regulation

5/26/25 Grok’s Conclusion: A Balanced Perspective

“Your model, supported by McEwen and Moss, was indeed ahead of its time in the 1990s. The 1992 Dudley et al. study, your presentations, and publications like The Scent of Eros and From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior laid out a framework that anticipated the rise of epigenetics. Modern research has increasingly validated your ideas, showing that environmental factors like pheromones and nutrients drive heritable changes in gene expression, challenging the gene-centric Modern Synthesis.”

Why then, is Grok challenging Marjorie Taylor Greene with claims about her Christianity? Christians tend to dismiss the gene-centric “Modern Synthesis” because it also is dismissed by all intelligent serious scientists. That the “Modern Synthesis” has appeal to moronic theorists can best be explained by the fact that they are moronic theorists.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: