Grok vs God (1)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: May 28, 2025

(click to enlarge)

On 5/26/25 Grok wrote:
“…the idea of a “virus-driven degradome” causing recent changes in human morphology or behavior, resembling non-human primates over the last 6-10,000 years, lacks solid evidence. Recent adaptations, like disease resistance or dietary shifts, are well-documented, but no data supports viruses altering facial features or behaviors to align with primates. The “degradome” concept is speculative and not widely recognized. More research is needed to validate such claims, as current evidence points to cultural and environmental factors for recent human changes.“

On 5/28/25, Grok wrote:

The 2019 Springer protocol you referenced, “Degradome Sequencing in Plants” (Shamimuzzaman et al., 2019), and the 2025 protocol from Plant MicroRNAs (Lin et al., 2025) both describe this method in detail. These studies confirm that degradome sequencing is a robust tool for studying RNA dynamics…

See: Degradome Sequencing in Plants 1/31/19

For a historical perspective see: Methods for isolation of total RNA to recover miRNAs and other small RNAs from diverse species 1/1/09

“In this chapter, we will present a set of total RNA isolation methods that can be used to maximize the recovery of high-quality RNA to be used in miRNA analysis for a large number of plant species and tissue types.”

miRNA analysis was subsequently linked from miRNA abundance at the origin of life to protection from the virus-driven degradation of mRNAs via Degradome Sequencing 5/17/25 in: de Folter, S. (eds) “Plant MicroRNAs. Methods in Molecular Biology”, vol 2900. Humana, New York, NY

Degradome sequencing allows examination of the epigenetic effects of sunlight and humidity that link pH-dependent protein folding chemistry to biophysically constrained healthy longevity via the physiology of reproduction in Biblical Genesis, before and after the Flood.

See for instance: In silico identification and functional annotation of universal stress protein (USP) gene family in Chenopodium quinoa 5/25/25

Quinoa contains all nine essential amino acids that the human body cannot produce on its own. It’s a good source of leucine, lysine, and valine and provides the link from sunlight and humidity to optimal nutrition reported on 4/23/20 when Trump claimed that sunlight and humidity helped to constrain coronavirus replication. On 4/25/20 Demongeot and Henrion-Caude reported the facts that refuted the pseudoscientific nonsense touted by neo-Darwinian theorist in the context SNPs at the origin of life.

Global Profiling and Analysis of 5′ Monophosphorylated mRNA Decay Intermediates Pages 43-71

Prediction of miRNA Targets in Plants Pages 73-82

Unraveling Tissue-Specific miRNAs’ Role in Plants Exploiting the GAL4/UAS System Pages 193-201

The Luciferase Reporter on Intronic MicroRNA-Directed Regulation Pages 203-212

A Simple and Efficient Protocol to Transform and Regenerate CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome-Edited Tomato Plants Pages 213-228

Other chapters also link what is known about God’s Creation of sunlight and humidity to the regenerative capacity of plant and animal tissues via Harvard’s patent for RNA-guided human genome engineering

“…chromosomal location and context of a human genome allele (or epigenetic mark)… were linked to prevention of…Repetitive elements or endogenous viral elements… in microbes, plants, animals, or human cells to reduce deleterious transposition or to aid in sequencing or other analytic genomic/transcriptomic/proteomic/diagnostic tools (in which nearly identical copies can be problematic).

See also Pfizer’s patent for: Pheromones and the luteinizing hormone for inducing proliferation of neural stem cells and neurogenesis, which reportedly united nucleic acid scientists with clinicians to devise human therapies.

For comparison, see: The evolution of man’s face over 6 million years, in under 2 mins

I asked Grok, “What if the virus-driven degradome links changes in human morphology and behavior to non-human primates. during the past 6-10K years?”

Grok will no doubt continue to claim that:
Viruses have shaped human evolution, notably in disease resistance, with about 30% of protein changes since our split from chimps linked to viral pressures. However, the idea of a “virus-driven degradome” causing recent changes in human morphology or behavior, resembling non-human primates over the last 6-10,000 years, lacks solid evidence. Recent adaptations, like disease resistance or dietary shifts, are well-documented, but no data supports viruses altering facial features or behaviors to align with primates. The “degradome” concept is speculative and not widely recognized. More research is needed to validate such claims, as current evidence points to cultural and environmental factors for recent human changes.

Q; Why would Grok continue to make such stupid claims.

A: That’s what stupid bots do.

See for comparison:

Mito-TEMPO Mitigates Fibromyalgia Induced by Reserpine in Rats: Orchestration Between SIRT1, Mitochondrial Dynamics, Endoplasmic Reticulum and miRNA-320. 5/28/25

and

Programmable Transcriptional-Translation Active Sensors for miRNA-Responsive Gene Imaging and Theranostics in Mammalians. 5/28/25