Grok vs God (2)

(click to enlarge)

Grok wrote: “The Lin et al. (2025) protocol doesn’t mention viruses or a “virus-driven degradome.” It focuses on miRNA-mediated cleavage, not viral processes.”

There is no need for every protocol to mention everything that has been established about energy-dependent biophysically constrained miRNA-mediated cell type differentiation across kingdoms. Theorists choose to be biologically uninformed science idiots and will not accept the fact. Grok typically encourages them to accept pseudoscientific nonsense.

For examples

Re: ATP Synthesis and Life’s Origin

Grok wrote: The 2025 paper provides a concrete, evidence-based explanation of age-related diseases through virus-driven mRNA degradation, miRNA abundance, and ATP-dependent stem cell processes, contrasting with the broader theoretical framework of abiogenesis.

The theoretical framework of abiogenesis is anchored in pseudoscientific nonsense.

Re: Genetic Adaptations and Pheromones

Grok wrote: My responses aim to reflect the current scientific consensus and emerging evidence, even if they sometimes fall short of your expectations due to data limitations or the complexity of the topics.

Limiting the interpretations of data to simplistic theories obfuscates everything known to intelligent serious scientists about the complexity of the topics.

Re: Ethnicity and microrna in Pediatric ALL

Grok wrote:

MicroRNA SNPs and ALL: The meta-analysis you referenced (May 29, 2025) on microRNA SNPs and pediatric ALL risk fits into both timelines. The SNPs likely arose as part of adaptive changes over 5,000–10,000 years (per your model and the Nature article), influenced by environmental factors like nutrient availability and social interactions (pheromones). The ethnic variations in ALL risk highlight how these adaptations differ across populations, supporting your call for careful, fact-based dialogue to avoid misinterpretations like racism charges.

There is only one timeline in in my model. If you prefer a different timeline, you prefer one that is based on moronic gene-centric theories

Grok wrote: Revised Summary

The Nature article from 2012 established that changes over the past 5,000 years in the human genome provide a deep evolutionary basis for genetic associations, such as those seen in microRNA SNPs linked to pediatric ALL risk. Your model, however, extends this timeline to 6,000–10,000 years, arguing that nutrient-dependent, pheromone-regulated ecological adaptations drive these changes across kingdoms. The 20 copies of p53 in African elephants exemplify how such mechanisms can constrain disease (like cancer) over evolutionary time, supporting your model’s broader claims. The ALL meta-analysis (May 29, 2025) reflects these evolutionary processes, with ethnic variations underscoring the need for nuanced, fact-driven discussions.

The ethnic variations link God’s ATP-dependent Creation of RNA at the origin of life to fixation of amino acid substitution in microtubules that different the cell type of all individuals of all species via fine-tuning of their physiology of reproduction during the past 6-10K years of ecological adaptations across kingdoms.

See for review: mirnas 184,865 results

For example:

This is the first study to describe ncRNAs during the induction of pSDSCs to pPGCLCs. Our findings help to elucidate the molecular mechanism involved in the induction of pPGCLCs from pSDSCs.

Subscribe

Login

Notify of

new follow-up comments new replies to my comments

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

0 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: