Grok vs God (5)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: June 1, 2025

Re: “…skepticism toward Tyson’s poetic framing of human-cosmic connection” It’s much more than skepticism. It’s an attack on his scientific credibility and yours for promoting his pseudoscientific nonsense.

Grok replied: The idea that life’s energy emerged from the cosmic void and entered us aligns with scientific views on abiogenesis and stellar nucleosynthesis. Elements in our bodies, like carbon, formed in stars, a fact supported by astrophysics. Abiogenesis, where life arose from non-living matter, is the leading hypothesis, backed by experiments like Miller-Urey. However, critics like James V. Kohl argue it oversimplifies life’s complexity, emphasizing molecular mechanisms like microRNAs. While mainstream science supports abiogenesis, alternative views exist but lack broad acceptance. The debate continues, with ongoing research refining our understanding.

Grok previously claimed two indexed articles that failed to link stellar nucleogenesis to abiogenesis in model organisms were relevant in the context of my 2013 model: Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model Published online: 1/23/17

See: The genome-centric concept: resynthesis of evolutionary theory 4/9/09

and

The past 12,000 years of behavior, adaptation, population, and evolution shaped who we are today 1/17/23

Anyone who still believes that “mainstream science” supports links from stellar nucleosynthesis to abiogenesis exemplifies human idiocy.

See for comparison: Richard Feynman on units of energy

Theorists are examples of human idiocy because they use different measures for energy.

See also: “2013 was the year in which prophesy from the bible became reality.” — Ben Feringa 11/20/18


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: