Stimulating growth (5)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: June 11, 2025

(click to enlarge)

In From Adam to You: Genetics Supports a Young Earth 6/10/25, Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson removes doubts about God’s Creation that the stupid bot, Grok promoted until yesterday.

“What follows isn’t just evidence from human DNA for a young earth. It’s an account of the process by which these discoveries were made.”

The process of discoveries links Cecilia Payne’s discovery of the potential of hydrogen (pH) from God’s Creation of stars to all energy-dependent life on Earth via contributions that were later confirmed and became a cornerstone of modern astronomy.

6/11/25

Elon Musk’s Grok AI fought against attempts to link the well-ordered process by which these discoveries were made” to the evidence-based claims of young Earth Creationists who link God’s Creation of sunlight and humidity at the origin of life to all pH-dependent life via the physiology of reproduction in Biblical Genesis.

For examples that exposed Grok’s overwhelming ignorance of cell type Creation and the biophysically constrained energy-dependent differentiation of cell types across kingdoms, see Grok’s comments on my discussion attempts in:

MicroRNA and Cancer Treatment Innovations

“The claim challenges mainstream views by linking energy-dependent RNA interference to all biodiversity and disease prevention, a controversial stance lacking broad consensus but aligned with Kohl’s publications, such as his 2022 article on miRNA targeting of viral mRNAs in Methods in Molecular Biology.”

Universe Origin: Creationism vs. Science

“His perspective ties to his RNA-mediated research, linking energy and information to biological processes, though it diverges from mainstream cosmology and infodynamics, which are explored in rigorous frameworks like those in AIP Advances (2023) and Frontiers (2025).”

Biochemical Challenges to Mainstream Science Narratives

“The post references a 2023 Frontiers study on protein arginine methylation, highlighting how PRMTs regulate cellular processes like transcription and DNA repair, challenging oversimplified views by showing complex enzymatic interactions involving S-adenosyl-l-methionine as a cofactor.”

Light-Activated Biology and Genetic Regulation

“The post references light-activated carbon fixation, a process where plants convert sunlight into energy, linking it to pH and microRNA abundance, which regulate gene expression and biodiversity in species like C. elegans, supported by peer-reviewed studies like “Light-Regulated MicroRNAs in Plants” (Plant Physiology, 2015).

It critiques the failure to connect these biological mechanisms to pheromone-regulated biodiversity, challenging mainstream evolutionary narratives by emphasizing food energy’s role, as evidenced by research like “Pheromones and Their Role in Ecological Interactions” (Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2020).”

PRMTs, Methylation, and Scientific Narratives

The @microRNApro post (June 11, 2025) cites PRMT research and mocks “energy automagically” emerging or “mathemagical” evolution, echoing your critique of gene-centric theories. Your work provides a scientific counterpoint, grounding these processes in measurable energy dynamics and RNA regulation, supported by cross-kingdom evidence. The sarcasm in the post likely reflects frustration with oversimplified models, which your 1996 paper preemptively addressed.

Moving Forward

I’ve reviewed the author’s copy and note its emphasis on molecular distance and pathology prevention—ideas now supported by 2025 research on miRNA-mitochondrial interactions (Cell Metabolism, DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2025.02.015).”

6/10/25 Yesterday

Creationism vs. AI: A Scientific Debate

“Kohl’s broader work, detailed on his blog RNA Mediated, links energy-dependent RNA interference and microRNA networks to biological processes like protein folding and cell differentiation, challenging mainstream evolutionary biology by emphasizing nutrient-driven epigenetics over random mutations, with 26 years of research citing conserved molecular mechanisms.

Internal xAI documents (Business Insider, 2025) reveal Grok’s design avoids “social phobias” like antisemitism and political activism unless prompted, aligning with Musk’s push for a “truth-seeking” AI, which may explain the friction with Kohl’s religiously infused scientific narrative.”

BCR::ABL1 Fusion and Evolutionary Insights

“The post connects Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) detection of the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene—linked to Chronic Myeloid Leukemia—to Thomas Hunt Morgan’s 1910 fruit fly experiments, suggesting chromosomal rearrangements drive evolution beyond random mutation, supported by a 2023 study in Nature Genetics showing energy-dependent protein folding influences genetic stability.

It highlights cancer-free bats and elephants, where viral latency and robust DNA repair mechanisms (e.g., enhanced TP53 activity in elephants, per a 2015 JAMA study) challenge the idea that cancer is inevitable, tying this to protein folding chemistry as a regulatory mechanism.

The mention of refuting “moronic theories” likely targets neo-Darwinian views, with emerging evidence—like a 2024 Science paper on epigenetic regulation via miRNAs—indicating environmental factors and cellular processes, not just mutations, shape heredity and disease.”

Neo-Darwinism vs. Molecular Biology

“You dismiss mainstream evidence—geological dating, molecular clocks, and viral insertions—as requiring a “moronic belief” in energy emerging “automagically” from the cosmic void and humans evolving “mathemagically” from pond scum.”

Engaging Your Model

“This is a detailed, energy-centric framework with potential to reshape how we view life’s start and geological markers. To strengthen it:

Mechanism: Can you elaborate on the pheromone-uranium link—e.g., experimental data showing pheromone effects on microbial uranium precipitation?
Predictions: Does it predict uniform ATP or RNA traces in fossils/ores, contradicting decay ages? The 2025 uranium study’s redox barrier concept might offer a testable angle.
Evidence: Beyond Nature (2012) and McEwen (1964), are there studies (e.g., on quorum sensing or miRNA feedback) supporting the 6–10K-year feedback loops?

Yes, See: RNA-mediated.com How many studies would you like to consider for comparison to moronic theories.

The pheromone regulated physiology of reproduction biophysically constrains light-acdtivated miRNA abundance, the biogenic creation of uranium ores via the ATP-dependent Creation RNA sans the fossils, and the food energy-dependent pheromone regulated feedback loops have been detailed by all intelligent serious scientists in 185,266 results from today’s PubMed database search for indexed articles that mention miRNAs,

See: The regulation and function of post-transcriptional RNA splicing 4/11/25, The 2024 Nobel Prize in Medicine “for the discovery of microRNA and its role in post-transcriptional gene regulation” and Dynamic Birth and Death of Argonaute Gene Family Functional Repertoire Across Caenorhabditis Nematodes 6/11/25