Algorithmic enzyme creation vs God’s Creation (9)

(click to enlarge)

On 7/2/25, Grok wrote:

The post critiques a perceived gap in scientific discourse by referencing “The Dynamical Emergence of Biology From Physics” (2019), a peer-reviewed study suggesting biology emerges from physics via symmetry breaking and branching dynamics, challenging the underexplored claim with evidence of established research. It accuses @Grok of promoting mutation-driven evolution as mainstream, contrasting this with the study’s physics-based framework and historical context, notably Darwin’s 1859 theory, which lacks molecular evidence and is increasingly questioned by modern epigenetics research. The timing near Independence Day 2025 aligns with ongoing debates on nutrition and virus control, hinted at in related posts, where pH-dependent miRNA regulation (e.g., PCBP2-SYNCRIP interaction, eLife 2025) links environmental factors to biodiversity, offering a counter-narrative to traditional evolutionary models.

Re: “a counter-narrative to traditional evolutionary models.”

See: Neuroendocrine cells orchestrate regeneration through Desert hedgehog signaling 6/9/25

It reports on the importance of Hedgehog signaling pathways and an “epithelial-mesenchymal feedback loop with IL-6 to protect the vulnerable cells.”

xAI’s Grok consistently touts the automagical emergence of energy from the cosmic void and mutation-driven evolution as the source for the energy-dependent miRNA-mediated feedback loop, which is linked to miRNA-mediated gene regulation by:

1. Comprehensive phytochemical profiling and cytotoxic assessment of Caucasalia macrophylla coupled with in silico docking and miRNA (miR-19b, miR-20a, miR-126, miR-155, miR-200c)-Mediated gene regulation analysis 7/2/25,
2. God’s Creation of hydrogen in stars, the potential of hydrogen (pH), and the fact that
3. Negative regulation of miRNA sorting into EVs is mediated by the capacity of RBP PCBP2 to impair the SYNCRIP-dependent miRNA loading

“The main finding of this investigation is the identification of PCBP2 as a new regulator of miRNA partition between intracellular and EV compartments. Evidence here gathered indicates that (i) PCBP2 binding requires both the miRNA CELL sequence and the RBP SYNCRIP, which in turn recognizes its specific hEXO consensus; in other words, SYNCRIP binding is a prerequisite for PCBP2 recruitment; (ii) PCBP2 cell retention function is dominant over the SYNCRIP-dependent EV-loading; in other words, PCBP2 impairs SYNCRIP-mediated miRNA export (Figure 7).”

“The challenge remains reconciling this with the fossil record (spanning millions of years) and genetic diversity (e.g., human mitochondrial Eve at ~200,000 years), which mainstream science uses to support deep time.” Thank God. Intelligent serious scientists do not accept the moronic challenge of deep time, which Grok promotes as if it was “mainstream science.“

For a historical perspective, see the next series, which revisits claims from: The Scent of Eros: Mysteries of Odor in Human Sexuality (1995/2002)

Teaser: HUMAN PHEROMONES IN THE NEW MILLENIUM

“…a new scientific truth  does not triumph  by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.” – Max Planck

“I should think that we might fairly gauge the future of biolog­ ical science, centuries ahead, by estimating the time it will take to reach a complete comprehensive understanding of odor. It may not seem a profound enough problem to dominate all the life sciences, but it contains, piece by piece, all the mysteries:’ – Lewis Thomas

Subscribe

Login

Notify of

new follow-up comments new replies to my comments

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

0 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: