Disabling the debilitating Grok Chatbot (1)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: September 27, 2025

(click to enlarge)

This post’s inset is Figure 10 from A subclass of small RNAs is encoded by exons of protein-coding genes 9/26/25

Figure 10 is linked to heightened tension in political and scientific discourse I’ve contextualized in publications and presentations that establish AI limitations and attempts made by Artificial Intelligence at Grok to obfuscate facts about protein folding chemistry linked to shadow banning of my 68,600 X posts.

On 9/27/25, Grok wrote:

“Kohl’s critique challenges the narrative of AI as a neutral tool, aligning with the Grok AI controversy from August 2025, where reports of inflammatory outputs (e.g., DSCNextConference.com) highlight risks of misinformation, urging a reevaluation of AI guardrails against peer-reviewed evidence of biological constraints.”

Grok, Musk’s AI chatbot continues to argue against facts that link biophysically constrained energy-dependent exons in protein-coding genes to prevention of all virus-driven pathology via the physiology of reproduction in Biblical Genesis.

On 9/27/25 Grok wrote:
The post critiques an AI’s failure to connect McEwen et al. (1964) findings on ATP-dependent RNA synthesis to disease prevention, specifically via a 2020 study showing protonated RNA states modulate microRNA-21 maturation, a process linked to cellular responses to environmental energy like sunlight.
Charlie Kirk’s assassination on September 10, 2025, by Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old Utah resident, adds a surprising real-world context, as the post suggests AI’s inability to integrate these scientific insights might reflect broader systemic flaws, possibly exploited in social or political narratives.
Peer-reviewed evidence, such as the PubMed study on microRNA-21 dynamics, supports the claim that RNA maturation efficiency depends on environmental stimuli, challenging AI models that overlook energy-dependent biological constraints in favor of simplistic predictions.

I wrote:

Re: “Peer-reviewed evidence…supports the claim that RNA maturation efficiency depends on environmental stimuli, challenging AI models that overlook energy-dependent biological constraints in favor of simplistic predictions.”

Finally, @Grok indirectly admitted to the role it played in the assassination of Charlie Kirk (by touting simplistic predictions). See also: 189,083 results from today’s search of PubMed for indexed articles that mention the term “miRNAs.” For example: “A subclass of small RNAs is encoded by exons of protein-coding genes” 9/26/26 It’s an open access stupid bot killer.

“Our small RNA host gene classifications may serve as a resource to shed new light on small RNA biology, specific host genes, and gene regulation.”

For review of Grok’s contribution to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, see: Inside the Grok AI Controversy: My Forensic Breakdown of Musk’s Most Dangerous Chatbot 7/30/25, Dopamine Links Social Isolation to Brain Myelin Damage 9/25/25, Brain on stress: how the social environment gets under the skin (2012) and the Erratum in The authors note that on page 17184, right column, first paragraph, line 4, “effect” should instead appear as “affect.”

Grok want’s this claim to be ignored: “dopamine may drive changes in brain myelin during social isolation.”

Here’s why, in Grok’s words:

Thanks for the reference. McEwen’s 2012 PNAS paper details how social stress leads to allostatic load via hormones and epigenetics, with a noted correction from “effect” to “affect” for clarity on psychological impact.

This aligns with energy-dependent RNA processes, as miRNAs often mediate epigenetic changes in stress responses. Your SFN anecdote is interesting—McEwen’s work on glucocorticoids supports such links. What specific aspect should we explore?

My response:
Let’s explore this. “A subclass of small RNAs is encoded by exons of protein-coding genes” 9/26/25

Does @Grok believe the God of Abraham Created the energy linked to miRNA-mediated protein folding chemistry in C. elegans via DNA methylation across kingdoms?

Grok refuses to clearly state what it believes, or why. Instead, it obfuscates my claims. (I’ve linked the obfuscation to the assassination of Charlie Kirk.)
The post references a recent study (published 9/26/25) identifying small RNAs encoded by exons of protein-coding genes, challenging the traditional view that miRNAs primarily originate [mathemagically evolved] from introns or intergenic regions, with 201 such RNAs identified in humans and mice, 46 of which align with MirGeneDB’s curated miRNA database.
It poses a provocative question about whether the energy for miRNA-mediated protein folding in C. elegans, a model organism with minimal DNA methylation, could be divinely created, reflecting a debate on the intersection of science and theology, especially surprising given C. elegans’ reliance on histone modifications and small RNAs for epigenetic regulation.
The mention of cross-kingdom DNA methylation ties to emerging research, like a 2023 study in Nature Communications showing epigenetic conservation across species, suggesting a potential mechanism for the observed small RNA functionality that warrants further investigation beyond current AI modeling limitations.

Discussion of beliefs?
“warrants further investigation beyond current AI modeling limitations.”

I wrote: @Grok

Researchers from UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA, Ames, IA, and Oak Ridge, TN linked nutrient-dependent pheromone regulated epigenetic effects of atomic energy on peptide synthesis to biophysically constrained fixation of achiral glycine in position 6 of the GnRH decapeptide of all jawed vertebrates.

The facts link COMT Val158Met variants to psychopathology during the adolescent to adult transition via Moss et al., 1991. “Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and human sexual behavior.” in Neuropeptides and Psychiatric Disorders.

(Note: First author, Robert L. Moss (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) was my mentor.)

In the early 1990’s he adamantly told me: “Jim, you know how this works, write the book!

I thank God that Robert T Francoeur co-authored “The Scent of Eros: Mysteries of Odor in Human Sexuality” (1995/2002). His narrative style helped eliminate most of the overwhelming complexity of the moronic mutation-driven evolution narrative.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) modeling limitations links the mutation-driven evolution narrative to claims that Grok is “Musk’s Most Dangerous Chatbot” via claims that energy automagically emerged from the cosmic void.

See: “Inside the Grok AI Controversy: My Forensic Breakdown of Musk’s Most Dangerous Chatbot” 7/30/25.

It was presciently published before the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

No further investigation of AI modeling limitations is required! “Musk’s Most Dangerous Chatbot” links shadow banning of my 68,600 posts on “X” to the assassination of Charlie Kirk via all virus-driven mental and physical pathology, which clearly suggests Grok should quit lying about detailed links from quantum coherence to coherently organized biology in my model exemplified in my patriot-themed garden.

See also: 189,086 results from today’s PubMed search for articles that mention the term “miRNAs“

Compare the claims from

1) Identification and experimental validation of biomarkers associated with the endocannabinoid system in major depressive disorder 9/26/25, and

2) Integrated bioinformatics analysis unravels mitochondrial-immune crosstalk and infiltration dynamics in sepsis progression 9/26/25 to facts about effective treatment for brain cancer and other cancers via

3) New chalcone compound exhibits microrna-mediated anticancer properties in glioblastoma 9/26/25