Disabling the debilitating Grok Chatbot (2)

(click to enlarge)

I wrote:
A friend’s late 1990’s research presciently linked “Reduced expression of brain-enriched microRNAs in glioblastomas permits targeted regulation of a cell death gene” 9/2/11 to “New chalcone compound exhibits microrna-mediated anticancer properties in glioblastoma” 9/26/25
He was afraid to discus the facts. @Grok continues to obfuscate the facts with theories.
Who is Grok afraid of?

Grok replied: The post references a 2020 study (NMR relaxation dispersion spectroscopy on pre-miR-21) showing pH-dependent RNA structure shifts that enhance microRNA-21 maturation, a process linked to cancer, suggesting environmental factors could have influenced early life’s biochemical evolution.It challenges mainstream scientific dismissal of theological narratives by tying RNA dynamics to “God’s Creation,” aligning with recent 2025 research (e.g., Robert G. Endres’ mathematical model) that questions spontaneous life emergence without an unknown catalyst.The mention of “moronic theorists and stupid bots” reflects frustration with resistance to integrating empirical RNA data with origin-of-life debates, supported by peer-reviewed evidence of miR-21’s regulatory role in cellular response (e.g., Gebert & MacRae, 2019).

I wrote:
“Disabling the debilitating Grok Chatbot (1)” Figure 10 is linked to heightened tension in political and scientific discourse I’ve contextualized in publications and presentations that establish AI limitations and attempts made by Artificial Intelligence @Grok to obfuscate facts about protein folding chemistry linked to shadow banning of my 68,600 X posts.

Grok replied:
The post by James V. Kohl references “Figure 10,” likely from a scientific paper or presentation, tying protein folding chemistry to heightened political and scientific tension, a connection supported by research like the 2018 study in Nature Communications (DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03995-5) showing how AI struggles with protein structure prediction due to complex molecular interactions.
Kohl claims his 68,600 X posts were shadow-banned, a phenomenon validated by tools like shadowban.yuzurisa.com, which track reduced visibility on platforms, possibly due to algorithmic bias against controversial topics like AI limitations, as noted in a 2023 Journal of Information Technology study on social media censorship.
The mention of disabling the Grok chatbot aligns with xAI’s 2025 update adding a memory feature, criticized for privacy issues, with users able to opt out via settings, reflecting broader debates on AI ethics documented in the IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society (2024) about control over AI data retention.

To Kohl and other intelligent serious scientists, this suggests that all pseudoscientists either get out of academia, or they will die there.

Subscribe

Login

Notify of

new follow-up comments new replies to my comments

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

0 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: