Summary: Coherence-inducing mechanisms is double-speak for mechanisms that are nutrient-dependent and pheromone-controlled.
We are currently studying the entropy of the coherence ensemble we defined for this work. “In general, higher trophic coherence would be associated with lower entropy states, which means that if networks are more coherent than the random expectation there must indeed be some kind of negentropic process at work.” Johnson notes that the impact in this case relative to trophic coherence would be found in quantifying the extent to which different empirical networks have been driven from their maximum entropy state. “This might be the best way of discovering when there are coherence-inducing mechanisms at work, how much energy must be involved, and ultimately identifying the nature of such processes.”
Feedback loops link the sun’s anti-entropic virucidal energy from the food that organisms eat to the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction in all living genera. The virucidal effect of ultraviolet light biophysically constrains viral latency. Energy-dependent RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions in supercoiled DNA are fixed in organized genomes via the physiology of reproduction and supercoiled DNA protects all organized genomes from the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA that links mutations to all pathology.
Coherence-inducing mechanisms is double-speak for nutrient-dependent and pheromone-controlled in the context of Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model.
Despite the validity of the model, it has not been accepted by neo-Darwinian theorists or “Big Bang” cosmologists. Ridiculous beliefs about emergence and evolution are pervasive and the pseudoscientific nonsense of their theories leads to claims about coherence-inducing mechanisms.
That is why I changed the FB page description at RNA-mediated after a series of posts (see below).
It took 20 years for others to realize that all life on Earth is food energy-dependent. Now, most people are indifferent to that fact. They refuse to learn anything about where the food energy comes from.
Differences in the energy of photons have been linked to quantized energy-dependent fixation of RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions. The substitutions biophysically constrain supercoiled DNA via the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction.
Virus-driven energy theft links the degradation of messenger RNA to mutations via amino acid substitutions in viruses. The substitutions in the viruses have been linked to all pathology via changes in the energy-dependent microRNA/messenger RNA balance.
For comparison, the pseudoscientific nonsense of neo-Darwinian theories links mutations from natural selection to the evolution of new species. In reality, light energy is quantized information. The information links physics, chemistry, and molecular epigenetics from the speed of light on contact with water and hydrogen-atom transfer in DNA base pairs in solution to learning, memory, and behavior via RNA-mediated events such as the energy-dependent creation of enzymes and the the de novo creation of G protein-coupled receptors such as olfactory receptor genes.
Top-down causation and de novo gene creation are exemplified by energy-dependent differences in the microRNA/messenger RNA balance that link natural selection for codon optimality to amino acid substitutions that link the physiology of reproduction to supercoiled DNA. Supercoiled DNA protects all organized genomes from virus-driven energy theft. That fact supports the beliefs of young earth creationists, which may be the only existing basis for discussion of quantum biology and refutations of neo-Darwinian theories that have linked olfaction to quantum souls. If there is another basis for the link from quantum physics to quantum souls, no one has detailed in in the context of top-down causation, which must include information about the creation of genes.
Most people seem unwilling to accept experimental evidence that attests to how genes are created or information that shows how virus-driven energy theft is linked to all pathology. Discussion of the energy-dependent paradigm shift would lead others away from pseudoscientific nonsense about emergence and/or beneficial mutations and evolution.
Only via discussion of facts about the paradigm shift will others learn what is currently known to serious scientists about the biophysically constrained nutrient energy-dependent chemistry of RNA-methylation and all biophysically constrained RNA-mediated protein folding chemistry. Simply put, the protein folding chemistry must be linked to all biodiversity by the physiology of energy-dependent pheromone-controlled reproduction in all living genera.
Your indifference to that fact is killing people.
See for comparison: Looplessness in networks is linked to trophic coherence (May 16, 2017)
Our theory correctly classifies a variety of networks-including those derived from genes, metabolites, species, neurons, words, computers, and trading nations-into two distinct regimes of high and low feedback and provides a null model to gauge the significance of related magnitudes. Because trophic coherence suppresses feedback, whereas an absence of feedback alone does not lead to coherence, our work suggests that the reasons for “looplessness” in nature should be sought in coherence-inducing mechanisms.
Reported August 14, 2017 as Trophic coherence explains why networks have few feedback loops and high stability
The researchers are also investigating whether negentropy – the opposite of entropy, and in which a physical, thermodynamic or biological process creates order – are affected by trophic coherence. “The modern concept of entropy,” Johnson points out, “comes from statistical physics and is a property of ensembles, as described above – that is, the entropy of an ensemble is simply a function of the number of elements it contains.” Moreover, he adds, graph ensemble entropy has proven to be a powerful tool for understanding various network properties. We are currently studying the entropy of the coherence ensemble we defined for this work. “In general, higher trophic coherence would be associated with lower entropy states, which means that if networks are more coherent than the random expectation there must indeed be some kind of negentropic process at work.” Johnson notes that the impact in this case relative to trophic coherence would be found in quantifying the extent to which different empirical networks have been driven from their maximum entropy state. “This might be the best way of discovering when there are coherence-inducing mechanisms at work, how much energy must be involved, and ultimately identifying the nature of such processes.”
See for comparison: Feedback loops link odor and pheromone signaling with reproduction
These studies also indicate that GnRH neurons are likely to influence numerous brain functions. They appear to transmit signals to as many as 30,000 or more neurons in 34 brain areas, consistent with previous studies showing GnRH+ fibers and GnRH receptors in multiple brain regions (Badr and Pelletier, 1987; Jennes et al., 1988; Jennes et al., 1997). BL+ neurons likely to receive synaptic input from GnRH neurons were seen in areas associated with numerous different functions, including odor and pheromone processing, sexual behavior, appetite, defensive behavior, motor programs, and the relay of information to higher cortical areas. These results may reflect a strategy wherein GnRH neurons can modify diverse functions in order to coordinate the internal state of the animal and its behavior with reproduction in order to optimize reproductive success.
No one I know is likely to understand this link from the anti-entropic virucidal energy of sunlight to prevention of all pathology because they must first understand the fact that proteins do not create themselves. There is no need for this inhibitor of the Hedgehog pathway or inhibition of any other pathway if cancer is prevented. But most people are not willing to learn about prevention because they think they can rely on medical practitioners to effectively treat their diseases. Do you think that your physician knows anything about light scattering characterization of glycoproteins and their interactions with other proteins and antibodies?
Light scattering can now be linked to the characterization of glycoproteins and their immune system interactions in all species on Earth. That suggests the speed of light on contact with water links energy as information to the de novo creation of the glycoproteins,
If so, the physiology of reproduction links pheromones to biophysical constraints on the creation of more glycoproteins in the context of morphological and behavioral differences in species from microbes to humans. That suggests the refutation of neo-Darwinism is complete, since the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA has been linked to all pathology in bacteria that become archaea before virus-driven energy theft causes them to become L-forms.
Simply put, Carl Woese was wrong. There is only one domain of life and virus-driven energy theft is what destroys all life on Earth.
What does that tell you about the late Carl Woese and/or Eugene Koonin?