Mimicking claims and ignoring facts

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: March 23, 2015

Summary: Last week, researchers reported they had caught up to “Nature” despite their inability to link viral microRNAs and nutrient-dependent microRNAs from the nature of non-living viruses to the nature of cellular life and to cell type differentiation via RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions, metabolic networks, and genetic networks. Today, we see the “billions of years” claim, with no mention of the over-the-weekend re-evolution of the bacterial flagellum or 1.8 billion years of epistasis in bacteria at the bottom of the ocean.

Mimicking nature’s chemistry to solve global environmental problems

Excerpt: “Nature has evolved over billions of years to convert nitrogen from the atmosphere into fertilizer or to harness solar energy to split water into oxygen and protons and electrons,” he explains. “As chemists, we’re trying to catch up in order to do those transformations ourselves.”
My comment: Last week, researchers reported they had already caught up to “Nature” despite their inability to link viral microRNAs and nutrient-dependent microRNAs from the nature of non-living viruses to the nature of cellular life and to cell type differentiation via RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions, metabolic networks, and genetic networks. See: Chemists claim to have solved riddle of how life began on Earth
Again, we see the “billions of years” claim, but no information on the over-the-weekend re-evolution of the bacterial flagellum or 1.8 billion years of epistasis in bacteria at the bottom of the ocean.

On March 18, in discussion of Chemists claim to have solved riddle of how life began on Earth, I wrote:
Excerpt: “Virus-driven thermodynamic cycles of protein biosynthesis and degradation clearly link ecological variation from entropic elasticity to nutrient-dependent anti-entropic ecological adaptations and organism-level thermoregulation via the biophysically constrained physiology of reproduction, which enables changes in the microRNA/messenger RNA balance. The changes link amino acid substitutions to cell type differentiation in all cells of all individuals of all species.”
My comment: That fact has been confirmed across disciplines. The first indication of that fact came from science fiction novelist Greg Bear. See this book review: Substantial excerpt from a review published in NATURE, March 2, 2000.
In the 2003 sequel, he integrated the nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction and communication. Arguably, the fact that an English major with no science background could predict the fall of neo-Darwinism may be an embarrassment to theorists. If not, it should be.
For example, how embarrassing is this? Nutrient-dependent / Pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: (a mammalian model of thermodynamics and organism-level thermoregulation)
Jon Lieff just placed the 5.5 minute video representation (linked above) into the context of his question: How can small pieces of DNA and RNA demonstrate such intelligent behavior? As is typical of Lieff, he informs others about what is known about biologically-based cause and effect. He adds plenty of common sense.
Here’s the obvious answer to the question How can small pieces of DNA and RNA demonstrate such intelligent behavior? It involves the creation of a nutrient-dependent thermodynamically controlled system for protein biosynthesis and degradation. It includes amino acid substitutions that stabilize the organized genomes of all genera via RNA-mediated events. The RNA-mediated events link non-living viruses to cellular life and cell type differentiation / proliferation via the biophysically constrained chemistry of protein folding and physiology of reproduction.
But this is not “Nature” at work across billions of years. It is the anti-entropic epigenetic effect of the sun’s biological energy. See: Short-wavelength near-infrared spectra of sucrose, glucose, and fructose with respect to sugar concentration and temperature.

Abstract excerpt: “The major spectral effect of decreased temperature or increased sugar concentration was a decrease in absorbance at 960 nm and an increase in absorbance at 984 nm, interpreted as an increase in the degree of H bonding.”

My comment: Biologically uniformed science idiots may continue to believe in theories that link H bonding to mutations and evolution. For example, see: Mutation-Driven Evolution conclusion: “… genomic conservation and constraint-breaking mutation is the ultimate source of all biological innovations and the enormous amount of biodiversity in this world” (p. 199). That may be the “Nature” of the best explanation they can offer for “…the enormous amount of biodiversity in this world.” But those who continue to claim “Nature has evolved over billions of years…” should probably stop to think how that might be possible given everything known to serious scientists and science fiction novelists (in 2003) about virus-driven entropic elasticity and anti-entropic light-induced biologically-based cause and effect via glucose metabolism.
See also: Elusive inheritance: Transgenerational effects and epigenetic inheritance in human environmental disease
Excerpt: Demonstrating whether transgenerational epigenetic inheritance occurs in mammals will require detailed genetic, epigenetic, transcriptomic, and metabolic profiling of well-controlled animal models with well-documented pedigrees.

My comment: They injected microRNA’s, which alter the microRNA/messenger RNA balance. That balance is linked to metabolic networks and genetic networks in all genera from RNA-mediated cell type differentiation. They claim that more evidence is required to demonstrate whether transgenerational epigenetic inheritance occurs in mammals. Simply put, they might as well claim that more evidence is required to demonstrate whether transgenerational epigenetic inheritance occurs in mammals via Feedback loops [that] link odor and pheromone signaling with reproduction via epigenetic effects on gonadotropin releasing hormone. They appear to not know there is a model for that: Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model.

The model links viral microRNAs and the nutrient-dependent microRNAs to a finely-tuned balance, which is required for increasing organismal complexity to arise in the context of the nutrient-dependent physiology of reproduction. The increasing organismal complexity of bacteria the re-evolve their flagella “over-the-weekend” in the context of nutrients linked from RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions to cell type differentiation in species from microbes to man via their pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction, suggests that something is wrong with reports about “Nature” that claim it has evolved across billions of years.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: