The Case for ‘Soft Atheism’ By GARY GUTTING Excerpt: “…much as I admire Dawkins’s work in evolutionary biology and in enhancing the public understanding of science…” My comment: The case against evolution. Quantitative analysis of RNA-protein interactions on a massively parallel array reveals biophysical and evolutionary landscapes Biophysical constraints that enable the intermolecular tethering of … Soft atheism: a case for Creation
“Darwin’s Theories“, submitted by Celia Secades of the Elesapiens website was the runner-up in the Third Annual NESCent Evolution Video Contest. (unfortunately, the video has been removed — perhaps for good reasons. For example: My comment: No experimental evidence supports the representations of mutation-initiated natural selection in the video. For comparison, tenOever on microRNA and Vaccines addresses what is currently known … Darwinian theories vs Darwin's facts
this “blinkered view” explains nothing because nothing about the adaptive evolution of species from microbes to man makes sense except in the light of biology.
glucose is a conserved energy source for yeasts and it also regulates gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) neurosecretory cells of brain tissue
Instead of simply offering more evolutionary theory, we detailed the link from the sensory environment to sexual orientation (e.g., the epigenetic effects of pheromones on the gonadotropin releasing hormone neuronal system).
it is the acceptance of theories, opinions, and stories about natural and sexual selection that are problem.
It’s been more than 2 decades since the work of Axel and Buck replaced the ridiculous misrepresentations of those who appear to have never once thought about olfaction for finding food in birds.
Desmond Morris Syndrome (DSM), where story-telling that incorporates evolutionary theory is better accepted than the basic principles of biology and levels of biological organization
Do the molecular mechanisms vary from those known to be required for adaptive evolution of the neurogenic and socio-cognitive niches…
On November 26, 2012 Robert Karl Stonjek announced to the members of the psychiatry research group: Dear Members, there will be no more discussion of JVKs ‘model’.
