This product is currently out of stock and is on backorder.
For comparison, pre-orders of “Cytosis: A Cell Biology Board Game” are being shipped this month, and the “board game” adds “depth” to what could already have been learned from the “card game.”
I ordered two cases of “Cytosis.”
Players start with the creation of energy and link ATP from the creation of RNA to the creation of all biophysically constrained life on Earth. Players may not learn that the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction biophysically constrains viral latency. But they will learn that neo-Darwinian theories are the invention of biologically uninformed science idiots.
Neo-Darwinian pseudoscientific nonsense starts with the “emergence” of energy and links “sudden energy jumps” from chemoautotrophy to the evolution of all morphological and behavioral diversity without addressing the facts known to serious scientists about the pheromone-controlled physiology of food energy-dependent reproduction and the RNA-mediated fixation of amino acid substitutions in organized genomes. The amino acid substitutions protect organized genomes from the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA that serious scientists have linked to all pathology.
…inducible provirus-host interactions occurring in these systems can profoundly influence the functioning of the microbial food web and the efficiency in the energy transfer to the higher trophic levels.
The cryo-EM technology links energy-dependent changes from electrons to ecosystems and all higher trophic levels of life in all living genera. If you believe that life is dominated by chemoautotrophy, you will lose the games “Virulence” and “Cytosis” faster than others who refuse to play by the rules that theorists invented.
Serious scientists will win all games of life because they know that life is energy-dependent, RNA-mediated, and that life is biophysically constrained the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction in all living genera. Serious scientists have known that for more than 20 years.
Pseudoscientists have made claims like these:
“A key element of my thesis is that it is erroneous to infer that a plurality of mammalian behaviors and endocrine responses is uniquely determined in an invariant way by single or small sets of chemical stimuli and to apply a generic and misleading name to the presumptive agents in support of such an inference.” — Richard L. Doty (The Great Pheromone Myth)
Jay R. Feierman: Variation is not nutrient availability and the something that is doing the selecting is not the individual organism. A feature of an educated person is to realize what they do not know. Sadly, you don’t know that you have an incorrect understanding [of] Darwinian biological evolution.
Jay R. Feierman: I am absolutely certain that if you showed this statement to any professor of biology or genetics in any accredited university anywhere in the world that 100% of them would say that “Random mutations are the substrate upon which directional natural selection acts” is a correct and true statement.
See for comparison: Deep sea viruses are an unexpected ringer (2008)