Observing energy-dependent intelligence and human idiocy
Conclusion: “Absolutely no information is provided about the sensory systems that enabled predators to detect their single-celled prey. No explanation is offered of how the sensory systems came into being that permitted single-celled organisms to detect their enemies’ scents and thus survive. Neither are we told what “evolutionary” mechanisms entered the equation during the construction of this extraordinarily complex mechanism.”
…slime molds have evolved a system for essentially mapping their terrain and memorizing where not to go…
The weekend resurrection of the bacterial flagellum in P. fluorescens showed that energy as information is the source of intelligence. For example, the quantized energy from sunlight links the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction from two food energy-dependent RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions to the ability of the fluorescent organism to move and find more food.
See: Evolutionary resurrection of flagellar motility via rewiring of the nitrogen regulation system
Foraging behavior is important to all organisms and so is the biophysically constrained quantized virucidal energy of sunlight. Without the energy-dependent ability to find more food, the virus-driven activation of a death gene awaits. But, eventually, organisms must find the “right” food source, to prevent the unnecessary suffering and/or premature death of people like John McCain.
See for example: Reduced expression of brain-enriched microRNAs in glioblastomas permits targeted regulation of a cell death gene
The phylogenetic utility and functional constraint of microRNA flanking sequences links energy-dependent base editing from microRNA editing to RNA editing and the pheromone-controlled fixation of RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions in the organized genomes of all living genera. Autophagy is the term used to link the quantized energy-dependent activation of endogenous substrates in all cell types from the creation of enzymes to the function of the innate immune system, which prevents the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA.
The alternative to the energy-dependent error-free polycombic de novo creation of replacement RNA and healthy longevity is the hecatombic evolution of pathology.
See: Virus-mediated archaeal hecatomb in the deep seafloor
We show here for the first time the crucial role of viruses in controlling archaeal dynamics and therefore the functioning of deep-sea ecosystems, and suggest that virus-archaea interactions play a central role in global biogeochemical cycles.
The virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA in bacteria is linked to the creation of archaea and L-forms. Similarly, it links the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA in humans to the creation of non-human primates via one amino acid.
For comparison to the ridiculous opposite scenario, see: A universal trend of amino acid gain and loss in protein evolution
Amino acid composition of proteins varies substantially between taxa and, thus, can evolve.
See also: A null mutation in SERPINE1 protects against biological aging in humans
Reported as: Genetic mutation in extended Amish family in Indiana protects against aging and increases longevity (Update)
“The findings astonished us because of the consistency of the anti-aging benefits across multiple body systems,” said Dr. Douglas Vaughan, the lead author of the paper who has been studying PAI-1 for almost 30 years.
During the past 30 years, all serious scientists have learned how important it is to link the sun’s anti-entropic virucidal energy from the physiology of reproduction in bacteria to fixation of RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions in organized genomes via the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction. The astonishing claim(s) of Eugene Koonin and others like him attest to facts about why others are astonished. Pseudoscientists are astonished by the the fact that serious scientists have linked what organisms eat to protection from the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA.
The proper question is: how has this sequence evolved? And the proper null hypothesis posits that it is a result of neutral evolution: that is, it survives by sheer chance provided that it is not deleterious enough to be efficiently purged by purifying selection. To claim adaptation, the neutral null has to be falsified.
Energy-dependent sequences do not evolve. That fact has not been considered by biologically uninformed science idiots. That is why they continue to insist that serious scientists falsify the statistical “neutral null,” which is an example of human idiocy.
If you ask an intelligent person like the late Richard P. Feynman where the energy comes from that supports the representation below, you are probably not an example of human idiocy.
High magnification of the slime mold Physarum polycephalum shows the cytoplasm pumping furiously through its huge single cell (left). This cytoplasmic streaming allows the slime mold to push forward toward nutrients and potentially carpet a surface (right).
Credit to the open access source: Seeing the Beautiful Intelligence of Microbes
See also: Neuroscience research provides evidence the brain is strobing, not constant
3. oscillations are a general feature of perception, not specific to vision.
“This strobing approach to attention would bind together relevant information at regular time points and allow new groupings of information to reassemble at other moments.”
See also: Celebrate Your Inner Virus
See for comparison: Evolutionists Cannot Account for the Origin of the Sense of Smell
…what Caprio, an evolutionist researcher, wants to say is that single-celled organisms unknowingly released chemical substances; that predators detected these and hunted them. In addition to being exceptionally illogical, his conjecture fails to answer how the sense of smell came into existence. Absolutely no information is provided about the sensory systems that enabled predators to detect their single-celled prey. No explanation is offered of how the sensory systems came into being that permitted single-celled organisms to detect their enemies’ scents and thus survive. Neither are we told what “evolutionary” mechanisms entered the equation during the construction of this extraordinarily complex mechanism.