The Origin of Information (4)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: August 4, 2017

(click to enlarge)

Summary: Others have learned that the energy in a hydrogen atom must be linked to all biodiversity on Earth.
The question is: “Where did the energy in the hydrogen atom come from?”
See: The Origin of Information (3)
Finally, someone is asking questions that can be summarized in one question (see below). Until now, on the International Society for Human Ethology’s Yahoo group, and elsewhere, the moderator: Jay R. Feierman has prevented the dissemination of accurate information on this topic. Now others have learned that the energy in a hydrogen atom must be linked to all biodiversity on Earth.
The question is: “Where did the energy in the hydrogen atom come from?”
See the discussion attempt at: 88233 Re: DNA Begins As a Quantum Wave, According to New Science

Excerpt: Much of the information in this article came from The Synchronicity Key: The Hidden Intelligence Guiding The Universe and You

Conclusion: Clearly though, our view of the universe and life itself is changing as these concepts are understood by more people each day.

The fact that DNA begins as a quantum wave linked to biophysically constrained amino acid substitutions was addressed in the context of: Codon identity regulates mRNA stability and translation efficiency during the maternal-to-zygotic transition
Natural selection for quantized energy-dependent codon optimality and the stability of messenger RNA during transgenerational epigenetic inheritance has since been placed into the context of experimental evidence reported as Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception.
See also the series of presentations at virtual conferences that began with: The Origin of Information: How to Solve It.
When I realized that people might not understand that the origin of information must be linked from quantum waves to RNA-mediated healthy longevity and from virus-driven energy theft to all pathology, I split the original presentation submission into two parts. The revised title was RNA mediated molecular epigenetics and virus driven entropy.
From hydrogen atom transfer in DNA base pairs to ecosystems was presented during the same virtual conference.
Several more presentations added information about top-down energy-dependent RNA-mediated biologically-based biodiversity. For example, this may be my final presentation at Labroots virtual conferences Energy as Information and Constrained Endogenous RNA Interference
The journalists from Labroots have ignored my presentations despite a series of my comments on their attempt to continue touting pseudoscientific nonsense about neo-Darwinian theories. It seems unlikely that any science journalist will admit to their overwhelming ignorance.
See for comparison:168949 From the evolutionary psychology Yahoo group. Re: DNA Begins As a Quantum Wave, According to New Science
Jay R. Feierman admits:

This claim is above my level of expertise to refute. It comes from a peer reviewed article in The American Chemical Society’s Journal of Physical Chemistry B. See below, which is taken from https://phys.org/news/2008-01-genetic-telepathy-bizarre-property-dna.html.

“Scientists are reporting evidence that intact, double-stranded DNA has the “amazing” ability to recognize similarities in other DNA strands from a distance. And then like friends with similar interests, the bits of genetic material hangout or congregate together. The recognition — of similar sequences in DNA’s chemical subunits — occurs in a way once regarded as impossible, the researchers suggest in a study scheduled for the Jan. 31 issue of ACS’ Journal of Physical Chemistry B”.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2008-01-genetic-telepathy-bizarre-property-dna.html#jCp

There are many things in physics and physical chemistry that seem incredulous to me. That includes some of the claims of quantum mechanics. What about the Penrose Hameroff Theory of Quantum Consciousness. See https://www.quantumconsciousness.org/sites/default/files/1998%20Hameroff%20Quantum%20Computation%20in%20Brain%20Microtubules%20The%20Penrose%20Hameroff%20Orch%20OR%20model%20of%20consciousness%20-%20Royal%20Society_0.pdf.

On several occasions, Feierman has threatened to ban me from the Human Ethology Yahoo Group. Then, he simply fails to post my comments when they do not support his nonsense.
I’ve added some comments to this discussion because it seems to be progressing nicely at a time after Feierman has admitted he knows virtually nothing about biophysically constrained biologically based RNA-mediated cell type differentiation.
See: Discus for discussion of
https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/08/01/teach-evolution-students-hold-creationist-views/
Feierman, and others like him, have been teaching neo-Darwinian theories either directly or indirectly. But Feierman’s nonsense has consistently been the most offensive to me personally. After publication of my 2013 review, I attempted to discuss the refutation of neo-Darwinian nonsense he had been touting since I first met him at a conference in 1995.
His responses to Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model include:
7/25/13
Jay R. Feierman: Variation is not nutrient availability and the something that is doing the selecting is not the individual organism. A feature of an educated person is to realize what they do not know. Sadly, you don’t know that you have an incorrect understanding [of] Darwinian biological evolution.
7/26/13
Jay R. Feierman: I am absolutely certain that if you showed this statement to any professor of biology or genetics in any accredited university anywhere in the world that 100% of them would say that “Random mutations are the substrate upon which directional natural selection acts” is a correct and true statement.
Now, he admits, albeit elsewhere, that he knows nothing about how food energy as quantized information must be linked to healthy longevity via the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction, or be linked from the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA to mutations and all pathology.
See also this example of a false dichotomy: Scholars who believe nurture trumps nature also tend to doubt the scientific method

One group, made up of psychologists, economists, philosophers and political scientists believes more strongly in the genetic influences on behaviour, beliefs and culture. The other group, consisting sociologists, non-evolutionary anthropologists, women’s and gender studies scholars and all humanities scholars (except philosophy), believes in the primacy of environmental influences.

No Genetics without Epigenetics? No Biology without Systems Biology?

…there has never been a genetics without an epigenetics.

Energy-dependent changes link the epigenetic landscape to the physical landscape of supercoiled DNA, which protects all organized genomes from the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA that all serious scientists have linked from mutations to all pathology in all living genera.
See: microRNA for more than 63,000 examples of that fact.