DS Wilson’s view of biophysically constrained life (2)

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: February 26, 2019

This View of Life: Completing the Darwinian Revolution (2/26/19)
Review submitted [2/26/19 at 10:10 am]- Thank you! We’re processing your review. This may take several days, so we appreciate your patience. We’ll notify you when this is complete.

He places neo-Darwinian evolution back into the context of ecological adaptations

You must read between the lines from his starting point: “The Phenomenon of Man” and Dobzhansky (1973) to realize he has changed the neo-Darwinian nonsense about evolution to support Darwin’s claims about energy-dependent ecological adaptations / “conditions of life”

In “Policy as a Branch of Biology” he links the creation of energy as information from the epigenetically-effected light-activated assembly of the microRNA-RNA-peptide nanocomplex to all biophysically constrained biodiversity in the context of Lenski’s experiments and the report from Accelerated Evolution Biotechnologies (AEBi).

Researchers from AEBi reported the cure for cancer in this context: “The ability of different peptides to inhibit autophosphorylation of EGFR is presented by the decrease of the fluorescent signal (Y axis).”

The historical record detailed here by DS Wilson, links the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA to the decrease in the fluorescent signal. It also links Dobzhansky’s claims about the food energy-dependent pheromone-controlled fixation of amino acid substitutions in chimpanzees and modern humans compared to gorillas from differences in peptides/proteins to healthy longevity.

My rating is based on the overwhelming amount of obfuscation. Many readers may not be able to read between the lines. Those who can will realize that he has refuted all the theories while pretending to support them. Bottom line, he pits the Creationists against the neo-Darwinian theorists and Big Bang cosmologists in an example of what happens after a paradigm shift. People like DS Wilson must claim: “We’ve always known the facts.” But now, they’ve been forced to link them to Darwin’s “conditions of life” instead of to mutation-driven evolution.

I recommend this book, without reservation, because intelligent readers will recognize what just happened. He proved that Evolution is a lie, except in the context of mathematical models that do not start with the creation of sunlight as the energy source.