Who created your virus-driven death gene? (3)

Summary: Students in the United States can learn how pseudoscientists bastardized Darwin’s theory by playing the game “Cytosis.” It links the creation of virucidal light to the creation of ATP and the creation of RNA, which biophysically constrains all energy-dependent biodiversity in the context of the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction and activation of the cell death gene.

See for comparison: Male Flies Find a Mate With Wedding Gifts Made of Vomit and Weird Dancing

When researchers artificially activated the fruitless circuitry with light, the flies were compelled to perform their mating rituals, but still in ways that were species-specific.

Please help to stop others who are reporting this nonsense without placing it into the context of what neuroscientists should already know about light-activated energy-dependent species-specific unconscious affect. The advance report links to a study published in the Journal of Neuroscience.

Optogenetic activation of the fruitless-labeled circuitry in Drosophila subobscura males induces mating motor acts

The news bastardized the findings before serious scientists could report the truth about the study results in the proper context, which is not vomit and weird dancing. A light-activated endogenous substrate was linked from the creation of enzymes, hormones, and receptors to the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction in all living genera.

See for example our award-winning 2001 review: Human Pheromones: “Integrating Neuroendocrinology and Ethology

The ‘affective primacy hypothesis’ [5] asserts that positive and negative affective reactions can be evoked with minimal stimulus input and virtually no cognitive processing. Olfactory signals seem to induce emotional reactions whether or not a chemical stimulus is consciously perceived. We theorize that the importance of human non-verbal signals is based upon information processing, which occurs in the limbic system, and without any cognitive (cortical) assessment. Affect thus does not require conscious interpretation of signal content. Underlying this fact is that affect dominates social interaction and it is the major currency in social interactions [6]. Affective reactions can occur without extensive perceptual and cognitive encoding. They are made with greater confidence than cognitive judgments, and can be made sooner [5, 7]. Olfactory input from the social environment is well adapted to fit such assertions. For example, chemical cues allow humans to select for, and to mate for, traits of reproductive fitness that cannot be assessed simply from visual cues.