Correctly modeling biological energy

By: James V. Kohl | Published on: March 22, 2015

The light-activated “origins of life” issue (see: Correctly modeling ecological adaptation) forces others to come out of the woodwork and try to overwhelm the biologically underinformed masses with the complexities of their existence after decades of attributing what is currently known about viruses, viral microRNAs, entropic elasticity, anti-entropic biological energy from the sun, and nutrient-dependent microRNAs, to mutations and evolution. Theorists have denied the obvious facts about light-induced amino acid substitutions and cell type differentiation controlled by the physiology of reproduction.
Watch for more reactions by theorists who are faced with accurate representations of biologically-based cause and effect. Here’s the first one:

NASA Is Amazed By A Huge, Unknown, Energy Field

Excerpt (with my emphasis): “…when you realize what they are talking about and trying to describe is fundamentally the creative, energetic workings of our amazing Universe that can only lead to more Truth, that’s cool!”
My comment: The evolution industry and “big bang” cosmology industry have never told us any truth about “…the creative, energetic workings of our amazing Universe…” That’s not cool! Let’s not pretend that it’s cool to keep telling lies until the pseudoscience (Feynman video) is recognized for what it is. 
Excerpt: “…billions of times more energetic than visible light. He goes on to say that science only knew of 4 sources of gamma rays before, and now they’ve found over 600 news ones…a third of which they have no idea what they are! That’s huge!”
Excerpt: “Gamma rays are by their very nature heralds of great energy and violence. They are a super-energetic form of light produced by sources such as black holes and massive exploding stars.”

Excerpt: “All of humanity is being presented with this energetic shift to either embrace willingly or vainly try to resist. The more discoveries like these, and the growing revelations in other areas regarding our true origins, the manipulation of humanity, the shift from ideology and heiearchy, the inter-connectivity of consciousness etc., the better.”

Correctly modeling ecological adaptation

Conclusion: Greg Bear predicted in 1999 that “…radical changes in the genome, brought about by mobilization of transposable elements such as human endogenous retroviruses, result in rapid change at the subspecies or species level.”
For comparison, see: Mutation-Driven Evolution “…genomic conservation and constraint-breaking mutation is the ultimate source of all biological innovations and the enormous amount of biodiversity in this world” (p. 199).
Also see, Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model. “Minimally, this model can be compared to any other factual representations of epigenesis and epistasis for determination of the best scientific ‘fit’.”

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

[…] type differentiation is this report: NASA Is Amazed By A Huge, Unknown, Energy Field. See also: Correctly modeling biological energy I doubt the ability of theorists to understand anything about biologically-based cause and effect […]

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts:
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x